Hotline Use in the United States: Results from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys
- PMID: 33057932
- PMCID: PMC8448293
- DOI: 10.1007/s10488-020-01089-0
Hotline Use in the United States: Results from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys
Abstract
Crisis hotlines are a fixture in providing mental health services to individuals experiencing mental and behavioral problems in the United States (U.S.). Despite this, and the growing need for easily-accessible, anonymous, and free services amidst the suicide and opioid crises, there is no study reporting U.S. national prevalence and correlates of hotline use. Data on n = 18,909 participants from the Collaborative Psychiatric Epidemiology Surveys (CPES), a group of three nationally-representative, population-based studies, were used to estimate the prevalence of lifetime and past 12-month hotline use. A series of logistic regression models examined sociodemographic, clinical history and service use correlates of hotline use. Lifetime and past 12-month hotline use was estimated at 2.5% and 0.5%, respectively. Being female, having a mental or behavioral disorder, experiencing suicidality, or interacting with other formal and informal sectors of the mental health service system were significant correlates of use. This study provides the first national estimates of crisis hotline usage in the U.S. Hotlines are more likely to be used by certain sociodemographic subgroups, but these differences may be due to differing psychiatric history and service use patterns. Efforts should be made to ensure that crisis hotlines are being utilized by other marginalized populations at high risk of suicide or overdose amidst the current public health crises in the U.S., such as racial/ethnic minorities or youth. To evaluate the role that crisis hotlines play in the mental health service system, national surveys should aim to monitor trends and correlates over time.
Keywords: Crisis hotlines; Epidemiology; Mental disorders; Mental health services; Suicidality.
Conflict of interest statement
COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Survey study procedures were approved by institutional review boards and informed consent was obtained from all participants.
References
-
- Alegría M, Canino G, Ríos R, Vera M, Calderón J, Rusch D, & Ortega AN (2002). Mental Health Care for Latinos: Inequalities in Use of Specialty Mental Health Services Among Latinos, African Americans, and Non-Latino Whites. Psychiatric Services, 53(12), 1547–1555. 10.1176/appi.ps.53.12.1547 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Alegría M, Takeuchi D, Canino G, Duan N, Shrout P, Meng X-L, Vega W, Zane N, Vila D, Woo M, Vera M, Guarnaccia P, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, Sue S, Escobar J, Lin K, & Gong F (2004). Considering context, place and culture: The National Latino and Asian American Study. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13(4), 208–220. 10.1002/mpr.178 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
