Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2021 Apr;105(1):31-38.
doi: 10.1007/s12306-020-00683-7. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Managing bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty: options and current trends

Affiliations
Review

Managing bone defects in primary total knee arthroplasty: options and current trends

A K Aggarwal et al. Musculoskelet Surg. 2021 Apr.

Abstract

While tackling with bone deficiencies in the context of total knee arthroplasty, it is imperative for the arthroplasty surgeon to arm himself with an in-depth knowledge on the various management options available and to use the right option for the right type of defect in the right patient. Aim of this review paper is to focus on the various options available and discuss the evolving concepts and recent trends with regard to the implications and treatment of bone deficiencies, in primary total knee arthroplasty. Relevant literature is evaluated with specific focus on the modality used for managing a defect, their clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates. Out of various classifications described, Anderson Orthopaedic Research Institute (AORI) system is universally employed to classify the bone defects. The currently available management options include more tibial resection, the use of bone cement to fill the defect, with or without augmentation with screws, bone grafting which may be autograft or allograft, metal augments, metaphyseal cones and sleeves. There is no single option which can be applied universally; each has its own advantages, disadvantages and specific indications with regard to application in specific types of defects, in specific patients as outlined in this article.

Keywords: Bone defects; Current trends; Management; Total knee arthroplasty.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Pal CP, Singh P, Chaturvedi S, Pruthi KK, Vij A (2016) Epidemiology of knee osteoarthritis in India and related factors. Indian J Orthop 50(5):518–522 - DOI
    1. Mori S, Ogata K, Hara M (2001) Bone graft for tibial defects in total knee arthroplasty. OrthopTraumatol 50(2):547–549
    1. Cuckler JM (2004) Bone loss in total knee arthroplasty: graft augment and options. J Arthroplast 19:56–58 - DOI
    1. Dorr LD, Conaty JP, Schreiber R, Mehne DK, Hull D (1985) Technical factors that influence mechanical loosening of total knee arthroplasty. In: Dorr LD (ed) The knee: papers of the first scientific meeting of the knee society. University Park Press, Baltimore, pp 121–135
    1. Dennis DA (1998) Repairing minor bone defects: augmentation & autograft. Orthopedics 21(9):1036–1038 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources