Predicting Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Validation of the Placenta Accreta Index
- PMID: 33058255
- DOI: 10.1002/jum.15530
Predicting Placenta Accreta Spectrum: Validation of the Placenta Accreta Index
Abstract
Objectives: The placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) incidence has risen substantially over the past century, paralleling a rise in cesarean delivery (CD) rates. Prenatal diagnosis of PAS improves maternal outcomes. The Placenta Accreta Index (PAI) is a standardized approach to prenatal diagnosis of PAS incorporating clinical risk and ultrasound (US) findings suggestive of placental invasion. We sought to validate the PAI for prediction of PAS in pregnancies with prior CD.
Methods: This work was a retrospective cohort study of pregnancies with 1 or more prior CDs that received a US diagnosis of placenta previa or low-lying placenta in the third trimester. Images of third-trimester US with a complete placental evaluation were read by 2 blinded physicians, and the PAI was applied. Surgical outcomes and pathologic findings were reviewed. Placenta accreta spectrum was diagnosed if clinical evidence of invasion was seen at time of delivery or if any placental invasion was identified histologically. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics criteria were used.
Results: A total of 194 women met inclusion criteria. Cesarean hysterectomy was performed in 92 (47%), CD in 97 (50%), and vaginal delivery in 5 (3%). Of those who underwent hysterectomy, PAS was histologically confirmed in 79 (85%) pregnancies. Of the remaining 13 who underwent hysterectomy, all met International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics grade 1 clinical criteria for PAS. With a threshold of greater than 4, the PAI has a sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 77%, positive predictive value of 72%, and negative predictive value of 90% for PAS diagnosis.
Conclusions: Contemporaneous application of the PAI, a standardized approach to US diagnosis, is useful in the prenatal prediction of PAS.
Keywords: Placenta Accreta Index; morbidly adherent placenta; placenta accreta; placenta accreta spectrum; placenta increta; placenta percreta.
© 2020 American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.
Similar articles
-
Third-trimester ultrasound for antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum in women with placenta previa: results from the ADoPAD study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Sep;60(3):381-389. doi: 10.1002/uog.24889. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 35247287 Free PMC article.
-
Prospective evaluation of impact of post-Cesarean section uterine scarring in perinatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum disorder.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Apr;59(4):474-482. doi: 10.1002/uog.23732. Epub 2022 Mar 8. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34225385 Free PMC article.
-
Interobserver agreement in MRI assessment of severity of placenta accreta spectrum disorders.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;55(4):467-473. doi: 10.1002/uog.20381. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31237043
-
Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of Placenta accreta spectrum: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 May 15;23(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05675-6. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37189095 Free PMC article.
-
Antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Apr;72:13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.06.010. Epub 2020 Jul 15. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021. PMID: 32747328 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of Placenta Accreta Index for Diagnosis of Placenta Accreta Spectrum in High-Risk Patients.J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022 Aug;72(Suppl 1):55-60. doi: 10.1007/s13224-021-01541-7. Epub 2021 Sep 5. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2022. PMID: 35928094 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing reproducibility in Magnetic Resonance (MR) Radiomics features between Deep-Learning segmented and Expert Manual segmented data and evaluating their diagnostic performance in Pregnant Women with suspected Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS).Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2021 Feb;11597:115972P. doi: 10.1117/12.2581467. Epub 2021 Feb 15. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2021. PMID: 35784397 Free PMC article.
-
Contemporary Placenta Accreta Spectrum Disorder Incidence and Risk Factors.Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Jun 1;145(6):665-673. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005919. Epub 2025 Apr 17. Obstet Gynecol. 2025. PMID: 40245410
-
Prenatal ultrasound scoring in diagnosis and postpartum outcomes prediction for Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS): a systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Dec 21;24(1):846. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07076-9. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024. PMID: 39709346 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance imaging improves diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum requiring hysterectomy compared to ultrasound.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024 Mar;6(3):101280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2024.101280. Epub 2024 Jan 10. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2024. PMID: 38216054 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Wu S, Kocherginsky M, Hibbard JU. Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 192:1458-1461.
-
- American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Placenta accreta spectrum: obstetric care consensus #7. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 219:B2-B16.
-
- Mogos MF, Salemi JL, Ashley M, Whiteman VE, Salihu HM. Recent trends in placenta accreta in the United States and its impact on maternal-fetal morbidity and healthcare-associated costs, 1998-2011. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2016; 29:1077-1082.
-
- Einerson BD, Cornstock J, Silver RM, Branch DW, Woodward PJ, Kennedy A. Placenta accreta spectrum disorder: uterine dehiscence, not placental invasion. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135:1104-1111.
-
- Shamshiraz AA, Fox KA, Erfani H, et al. Multidisciplinary team learning in the management of the morbidly adherent placenta: outcome improvements over time. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 216:612.1-612.e5.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous