Functional reconstruction of severe hand injuries using allogeneic tendons: a retrospective study
- PMID: 33059512
- PMCID: PMC7580153
- DOI: 10.1177/0300060520955032
Functional reconstruction of severe hand injuries using allogeneic tendons: a retrospective study
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of allogeneic tendons for functional reconstruction of severe hand injuries.
Methods: From August 2007 to July 2014, we performed functional reconstruction with tendon allografts for severe hand injuries affecting two or more tendons. At the final follow-up, we assessed total active motion (TAM); pincer pinch strength; grip strength; Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score; degree of satisfaction; and adhesion. We measured the white blood cell count, C-reactive protein concentration, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, total T-cell count, and CD4+T/CD8+T ratio to evaluate the immune response and check for infection.
Results: Ten patients received 26 allogeneic tendons to reconstruct hand function. The average follow-up period was 50.0 months (range, 24-82 months). The TAM was 126.4° (12°-253°), pincer pinch strength was 0.83 kg (0-4.5 kg), and grip strength was 13.69 kg (4-41.5 kg). The DASH score was 14.25 (3.3-30.8), and seven and three patients were satisfied and partially satisfied, respectively. One patient developed tendon adhesion. All immune and infectious parameters were within the reference range.
Conclusion: Functional reconstruction using allogeneic tendons for severe hand injuries with multiple tendon defects was effective and safe; however, more research is needed.
Keywords: Allograft; function; hand; reconstruction; severe injury; tendon.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation and functional assessment of flexor tendon repair in the hand.Acta Chir Belg. 2006 Sep-Oct;106(5):560-5. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2006.11679952. Acta Chir Belg. 2006. PMID: 17168270
-
A randomized clinical trial comparing early active motion programs: Earlier hand function, TAM, and orthotic satisfaction with a relative motion extension program for zones V and VI extensor tendon repairs.J Hand Ther. 2020 Jan-Mar;33(1):13-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2018.10.003. Epub 2019 Mar 21. J Hand Ther. 2020. PMID: 30905495 Clinical Trial.
-
Complex extensor tendon injuries: early active motion following single-stage reconstruction.J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008 Dec;33(6):753-9. doi: 10.1177/1753193408092786. Epub 2008 Aug 11. J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2008. PMID: 18694916
-
Entire flexor carpi radialis tendon harvest for thumb carpometacarpal arthroplasty alters wrist kinetics.J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Sep;31(7):1171-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.05.005. J Hand Surg Am. 2006. PMID: 16945722
-
A device for zone-II flexor tendon repair. Surgical technique.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Mar;88 Suppl 1 Pt 1:37-49. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00978. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006. PMID: 16510799 Review.
Cited by
-
Allograft Use in Hand Surgery - 'Off the Shelf' Tendon Reconstruction: A Scoping Review.Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Feb;33(1):85-93. doi: 10.1177/22925503231190924. Epub 2023 Aug 10. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025. PMID: 39876859 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Drake DB, Tilt AC, DeGeorge BR. Acellular flexor tendon allografts: a new horizon for tendon reconstruction. J Hand Surg Am 2013; 38: 2491–2495. DOI:10.1016/j.jhsa.2013.03.039. - PubMed
-
- Türker T, Hassan K, Capdarest-Arest N. Extensor tendon gap reconstruction: a review. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2016; 50: 1–6. DOI: 10.3109/2000656X.2015.1086363. - PubMed
-
- Bottoni CR, Smith EL, Shaha J, et al. Autograft versus allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomized clinical study with a minimum 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2015; 43: 2501–2509. DOI: 10.1177/0363546515596406. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials