Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Jan;36(Suppl 1):64-70.
doi: 10.1007/s12055-019-00813-2. Epub 2019 Apr 6.

Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function

Affiliations
Review

Geometry of cusp and root determines aortic valve function

Shunsuke Matsushima et al. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Jan.

Abstract

The aortic valve is the functional unit of cusp and root. Various geometrical and functional analyses for the aortic valve unit have been executed to understand normal valve configuration and improve aortic valve repair. Different concepts and procedures have then been proposed for reparative approach, and aortic valve repair is still not standardized like mitral valve repair. It has become apparent, however, that interpretation of the geometry of the aortic cusp and root and its appropriate application to operative strategy lead to creating a functioning aortic valve. Herein, the aortic valve geometry and its clinical implications are reviewed to provide information for the selection of appropriate operative strategies.

Keywords: Aortic valve geometry; Aortic valve repair; Cusp effective height.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interestThe authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Normal aortic valve configuration. a Diagrammatic representation. b Schematic drawing, modified from Schäfers 2013 [8]. (eH effective height, gH geometric height)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Diagrammatic representation of aortic valve morphology and schematic drawing of cusp insertion line, modified from Schäfers 2008 [9]. a Tricuspid aortic valve. b Bicuspid aortic valve. c Unicuspid aortic valve. (LC left coronary sinus, NC noncoronary sinus, RC right coronary sinus)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Prolapsed aortic valve configuration. a Diagrammatic representation. b Schematic drawing, modified from Schäfers 2013 [8]. (eH effective height; gH geometric height)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Correlation between aortic valve configuration and each geometrical determinant. a With different geometric height, modified from Marom 2013 [24]. b With different virtual basal ring diameter, modified from Marom 2013 [25]. c With different sinotubular junction diameter, modified from Marom 2013 [26]

References

    1. Taylor WJ, Thrower WB, Black H, Harken DE. The surgical correction of aortic insufficiency by circumclusion. J Thorac Surg. 1958;35:192–205. - PubMed
    1. Carpentier A. Cardiac valve surgery--the "French correction". J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1983;86:323–337. - PubMed
    1. Duran CG. Reconstructive techniques for rheumatic aortic valve disease. J Card Surg. 1988;3:23–28. - PubMed
    1. Cosgrove DM, Rosenkranz ER, Hendren WG, Bartlett JC, Stewart WJ. Valvuloplasty for aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1991;102:571–576. - PubMed
    1. Frater RW. Aortic valve insufficiency due to aortic dilatation: correction by sinus rim adjustment. Circulation. 1986;74:I136–I142. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources