The Impact of Appendectomy in Clostridium difficile Infection and Length of Hospital Stay
- PMID: 33062466
- PMCID: PMC7549846
- DOI: 10.7759/cureus.10342
The Impact of Appendectomy in Clostridium difficile Infection and Length of Hospital Stay
Abstract
Introduction We aim to investigate Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) recurrence, severity, complications, and length of hospital stay in patients with and without prior history of appendectomy who were admitted to the hospital with CDI. Method We analyzed retrospective data for 862 patients, 18 years and older, with C. difficile inpatients diagnosed between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 and sorted into two groups, with or without prior appendicectomy, to look for outcomes such as recurrence, hospital stay, complications, and related death in each group and use statistical analysis for comparison. Result There were 862 patients admitted with CDI, of which 122 (14.2%) had a prior history of appendectomy and 740 (85.8%) did not. Patients with an appendectomy prior were older (median age of 75 vs. 69, p = 0.0033) and had a higher proportion of females (68.9% vs. 53.6%, p = 0.0017). C. difficile recurrence in prior appendicectomy group vs. no appendectomy group was 12.3% and 9.3%, respectively, but no statistical difference was noted (p = 0.28). Also, there was no statistical difference in complications like ileus, colectomy, and mortality related to CDI in both groups. However, patients with appendectomies had significantly shorter hospital stays during C. difficile admission compared to patients without appendectomies (median of six days vs. seven days, p = 0.0014). Conclusion Our study shows that there is no statistical difference in the recurrence, severity, and complications of CDI in the presence or absence of the appendix but remarkably noted that people with prior appendicectomy had a shorter hospital stay.
Keywords: abdominal pain; antibiotics; clostridium difficile; clostridium difficile infection.
Copyright © 2020, Essrani et al.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
-
- Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults and children: 2017 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, et al. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/66/7/e1/4855916 Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:0. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated infections. Barbut F, Petit JC. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2001;7:405–410. - PubMed
-
- Recent advances in Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Monaghan T, Boswell T, Mahida YR. Postgrad Med J. 2009;85:152–162. - PubMed
-
- Recurrent Clostridium difficile diarrhea: characteristics of and risk factors for patients enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded trial. Fekety R, McFarland LV, Surawicz CM, Greenberg RN, Elmer GW, Mulligan ME. https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/24/3/324/430693. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24:324–333. - PubMed
-
- An update on diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of Clostridium difficile-associated disease. Aslam S, Musher DM. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2006;35:315–335. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources