Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 29;2(10):e0230.
doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000230. eCollection 2020 Oct.

Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Affiliations

Physiologic Response to Angiotensin II Treatment for Coronavirus Disease 2019-Induced Vasodilatory Shock: A Retrospective Matched Cohort Study

Daniel E Leisman et al. Crit Care Explor. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the early physiologic response to angiotensin-II treatment in patients with coronavirus disease 2019-induced respiratory failure and distributive shock.

Design: Retrospective consecutive-sample cohort study.

Setting: Three medical ICUs in New York during the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak.

Patients: All patients were admitted to the ICU with respiratory failure and were receiving norepinephrine for distributive shock.

Interventions: The treatment groups were patients who received greater than or equal to 1 hour of angiotensin-II treatment. Time-zero was the time of angiotensin-II initiation. Controls were identified using a 2:1 hierarchical process that matched for 1) date and unit of admission; 2) specific organ support modalities; 3) age; 4) chronic lung, cardiovascular, and kidney disease; and 5) sex. Time-zero in the control group was 21 hours post vasopressor initiation, the mean duration of vasopressor therapy prior to angiotensin-II initiation in the treated group.

Measurements and main results: Main outcomes were trajectories of vasopressor requirements (in norepinephrine-equivalent dose) and mean arterial pressure. Additionally assessed trajectories were respiratory (Pao2/Fio2, Paco2), metabolic (pH, creatinine), and coagulation (d-dimer) dysfunction indices after time-zero. We also recorded adverse events and clinical outcomes. Trajectories were analyzed using mixed-effects models for immediate (first 6 hr), early (48 hr), and sustained (7 d) responses. Twenty-nine patients (n = 10 treated, n = 19 control) were identified. Despite matching, angiotensin-II-treated patients had markedly greater vasopressor requirements (mean: 0.489 vs 0.097 µg/kg/min), oxygenation impairment, and acidosis at time-zero. Nonetheless, angiotensin-II treatment was associated with an immediate and sustained reduction in norepinephrine-equivalent dose (6 hr model: β = -0.036 µg/kg/min/hr; 95% CI: -0.054 to -0.018 µg/kg/min/hr, p interaction=0.0002) (7 d model: β = -0.04 µg/kg/min/d, 95% CI: -0.05 to -0.03 µg/kg/min/d; p interaction = 0.0002). Compared with controls, angiotensin-II-treated patients had significantly faster improvement in mean arterial pressure, hypercapnia, acidosis, baseline-corrected creatinine, and d-dimer. Three thrombotic events occurred, all in control patients.

Conclusions: Angiotensin-II treatment for coronavirus disease 2019-induced distributive shock was associated with rapid improvement in multiple physiologic indices. Angiotensin-II in coronavirus disease 2019-induced shock warrants further study.

Keywords: angiotensin II; coronavirus disease 2019; norepinephrine; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection; shock; vasoconstrictor agents.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Leisman discloses that La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company, the manufacturer of Giapreza, provided a sample of their drug free of charge for mouse experiments that are not related to the present study, and La Jolla Pharmaceutical Company had no access to any of that data or any role in its analysis, interpretation, or eventual dissemination and has had no role whatsoever in any aspect of the present study. Dr. Taylor discloses grant support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Deutschman discloses grant support from the NIH and consulting fees from Enlivex Therapeutics. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Vasopressor requirements in norepinephrine-equivalent dose (NED) (A and B) and mean arterial pressure (C and D) over time in angiotensin-II (Ang-II)–treated patients versus controls. A and B, Also shows the angiotensin-II dose in Ang-II–treated patients. Markers and error bars indicate mean and sd. Righthand tables indicate interaction coefficients (β), their 95% CIs, and interaction p values from each of the mixed-effects models for time by treatment group. All coefficients are standardized to reflect the difference in rates of change per day, with the control group as the referent. For example, β equals to –0.10 in (A) indicates that the NED decreased in the Ang-II by 0.10 µg/kg/min more per day than it did in the control group over 48 hours. AT2 = angiotensin-II, pint = p value of the interaction coefficient.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Markers and error bars indicate mean and sd. Annotations indicate interaction coefficients (β), their 95% CIs, and interaction p values from each of the mixed-effects models for time by treatment group. β reflect the difference in daily rates of change with the control group as the referent. For example, β equals to –0.2 in (C) indicates creatinine decreased in the angiotensin-II group by 0.2 mg/dL/d more than in controls. Paco2 is adjusted for minute ventilation. Creatinine is adjusted for the patient’s prehospitalization baseline. d-dimer was log-transformed to correct violation of the homoscedastic error assumption for modeling. AT2 = angiotensin-II, pint = p value of the interaction coefficient, P/F ratio = ratio of Pao2 to Fio2, SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

References

    1. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in New York City: A prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020; 395:1763–1770 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu C, Chen X, Cai Y, et al. Risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome and death in patients with Coronavirus disease 2019 pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA Intern Med. 2020; 180:934–943 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arentz M, Yim E, Klaff L, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of 21 critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Washington State. JAMA. 2020; 323:1612–1614 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirsch JS, Ng JH, Ross DW, et al. ; Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium; Northwell Nephrology COVID-19 Research Consortium. Acute kidney injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Kidney Int. 2020; 98:209–218 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Blanco-Melo D, Nilsson-Payant BE, Liu WC, et al. Imbalanced host response to SARS-CoV-2 drives development of COVID-19. Cell. 2020; 181:1036–1045.e9 - PMC - PubMed