Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 9;27(12):1987-1998.
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa235.

A systematic literature review of Native American and Pacific Islanders' perspectives on health data privacy in the United States

Affiliations

A systematic literature review of Native American and Pacific Islanders' perspectives on health data privacy in the United States

Riley Taitingfong et al. J Am Med Inform Assoc. .

Abstract

Background: Privacy-related concerns can prevent equitable participation in health research by US Indigenous communities. However, studies focused on these communities' views regarding health data privacy, including systematic reviews, are lacking.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review analyzing empirical, US-based studies involving American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (NHPI) perspectives on health data privacy, which we define as the practice of maintaining the security and confidentiality of an individual's personal health records and/or biological samples (including data derived from biological specimens, such as personal genetic information), as well as the secure and approved use of those data.

Results: Twenty-one studies involving 3234 AI/AN and NHPI participants were eligible for review. The results of this review suggest that concerns about the privacy of health data are both prevalent and complex in AI/AN and NHPI communities. Many respondents raised concerns about the potential for misuse of their health data, including discrimination or stigma, confidentiality breaches, and undesirable or unknown uses of biological specimens.

Conclusions: Participants cited a variety of individual and community-level concerns about the privacy of their health data, and indicated that these deter their willingness to participate in health research. Future investigations should explore in more depth which health data privacy concerns are most salient to specific AI/AN and NHPI communities, and identify the practices that will make the collection and use of health data more trustworthy and transparent for participants.

Keywords: Indigenous populations; health information; personal genetic information, research ethics; privacy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
PRISMA Flowchart of article searching and exclusion.
Figure 1.
Figure 1.
continued
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Summary of key findings.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Summary of research and policy recommendations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Garrison NA. Genomic justice for Native Americans: impact of the Havasupai case on genetic research. Sci Technol Hum Val 2013; 38 (2): 201–23. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Garrison NA, Hudson M, Ballantyne LL, et al. Genomic research through an indigenous lens: understanding the expectations. Annu Rev Genom Hum Genet 2019; 20 (1): 495–517. - PubMed
    1. Pacheco CM, Daley SM, Brown T, Filippi M, Greiner KA, Daley CM.. Moving forward: breaking the cycle of mistrust between American Indians and researchers. Am J Public Health 2013; 103 (12): 2152–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cavalli-Sforza LL, A.C W, Cantor CR, Cook-Deegan RM, King MC.. Call for a worldwide survey of human genetic diversity: a vanishing opportunity for the Human Genome Project. Genomics 1991; 11 (2): 490–1. - PubMed
    1. Harry D. The Human Genome Diversity Project: implications for indigenous peoples. Abya Yala News 1994; 8 (4): 13–5. - PubMed

Publication types