Expulsion at home for early medical abortion: A systematic review with meta-analyses
- PMID: 33063314
- DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14025
Expulsion at home for early medical abortion: A systematic review with meta-analyses
Abstract
Introduction: The safety and acceptability of medical abortion using mifepristone and misoprostol at home at ≤9+0 weeks' gestation is well established. However, the upper gestational limit at which the procedure remains safe and acceptable at home is not known. To inform a national guideline on abortion care we conducted a systematic review to determine what gestational limit for expulsion at home offers the best balance of benefits and harms for women who are having medical abortion.
Material and methods: We searched Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Cinahl Plus and Web-of-Science on 2 January 2020 for prospective and retrospective cohort studies with ≥50 women per gestational age group, published in English from 1995 onwards, that included women undergoing medical abortion and compared home expulsion of pregnancies of ≤9+0 weeks' gestational age with pregnancies of 9+1 -10+0 weeks or >10+1 weeks' gestational age, or compared the latter two gestational age groups. We assessed risk-of-bias using the Newcastle-Ottowa scale. All outcomes were meta-analyzed as risk ratios (RR) using the Mantel-Haenszel method. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.
Results: Six studies (n = 3381) were included. The "need for emergency care/admission to hospital" (RR = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45-1.4), "hemorrhage requiring transfusion/≥500 mL blood loss" (RR = 0.62, 95% CI 0.11-3.55), patient satisfaction (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.95-1.03), pain (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.82-1.02), and "complete abortion without the need for surgical intervention" (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 1-1.05) did not differ statistically significantly between the ≤9+0 and >9+0 weeks' gestation groups. The rates of vomiting (RR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.69-0.93) and diarrhea (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.73-0.99) were statistically significantly lower in the ≤9+0 weeks group but these differences were not considered clinically important. We found no studies comparing pregnancies of 9+1 -10+0 weeks' gestation with pregnancies of >10+0 weeks' gestation. The certainty of this evidence was predominantly low and mainly compromised by low event rates and loss to follow up.
Conclusions: Women who are having a medical abortion and will be taking mifepristone up to and including 10+0 weeks' gestation should be offered the option of expulsion at home after they have taken the misoprostol. Further research needs to determine whether the gestational limit for home expulsion can be extended beyond 10+0 weeks.
Keywords: aborted fetus; ambulatory care; first; induced abortion; mifepristone; misoprostol; outpatients; pregnancy trimester; self-administration.
© 2020 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Similar articles
-
Self-administered versus provider-administered medical abortion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Mar 9;3(3):CD013181. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013181.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 32150279 Free PMC article.
-
Simultaneous compared to interval administration of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10+0 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Oct;46(4):270-278. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2019-200448. Epub 2020 Feb 20. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020. PMID: 32079651
-
Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Jun;222(6):551-563.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1244. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 31715147
-
Home self-administration of vaginal misoprostol for medical abortion at 50-63 days compared with gestation of below 50 days.Hum Reprod. 2010 May;25(5):1153-7. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq037. Epub 2010 Feb 19. Hum Reprod. 2010. PMID: 20172871
-
Low-dose mifepristone followed by vaginal misoprostol at 48 hours for abortion up to 63 days.Contraception. 2000 Jan;61(1):41-6. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(99)00119-5. Contraception. 2000. PMID: 10745068 Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Telemedicine for the provision of medication abortion to pregnant people at up to twelve weeks of pregnancy: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.Reprod Health. 2024 Sep 19;21(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01864-4. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39300581 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 impact in abortions' practice, a regional French evaluation.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021 May;50(5):102038. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.102038. Epub 2020 Dec 8. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2021. PMID: 33307242 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and acceptability of home use of misoprostol for medical abortion up to 10 weeks of pregnancy.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023 May;102(5):541-548. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14549. Epub 2023 Mar 18. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2023. PMID: 36933004 Free PMC article.
-
Medical methods for first trimester abortion.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 24;5(5):CD002855. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002855.pub5. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35608608 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness and acceptability of "at home" versus "at hospital" early medical abortion - A lesson from the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective cohort study.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 Dec;267:150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.10.035. Epub 2021 Nov 3. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021. PMID: 34773877 Free PMC article.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Cameron ST, Glasier AF, Logan J, Benton L, Baird DT. Impact of the introduction of new medical methods on therapeutic abortions at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996;103:1222-1229.
-
- WHO. Medical management of abortion, 2019. Available from: https://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/medical-management-a... (accessed 16 April 2020).
-
- Cameron ST, Glasier A, Dewart H, Johnstone A. Women’ s experiences of the final stage of early medical abortion at home: results of a pilot survey. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2010;36:213-216.
-
- Lohr PA, Wade J, Riley L, Fitzgibbon A, Furedi A. Women’ s opinions on the home management of early medical abortion in the UK. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2010;36:21-25.
-
- Schmidt-Hansen M, Cameron S, Lohr P, Hasler E. Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks’ gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;222:551-563.e13.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical