Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 16:9:e55212.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.55212.

Secondary ossification center induces and protects growth plate structure

Affiliations

Secondary ossification center induces and protects growth plate structure

Meng Xie et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Growth plate and articular cartilage constitute a single anatomical entity early in development but later separate into two distinct structures by the secondary ossification center (SOC). The reason for such separation remains unknown. We found that evolutionarily SOC appears in animals conquering the land - amniotes. Analysis of the ossification pattern in mammals with specialized extremities (whales, bats, jerboa) revealed that SOC development correlates with the extent of mechanical loads. Mathematical modeling revealed that SOC reduces mechanical stress within the growth plate. Functional experiments revealed the high vulnerability of hypertrophic chondrocytes to mechanical stress and showed that SOC protects these cells from apoptosis caused by extensive loading. Atomic force microscopy showed that hypertrophic chondrocytes are the least mechanically stiff cells within the growth plate. Altogether, these findings suggest that SOC has evolved to protect the hypertrophic chondrocytes from the high mechanical stress encountered in the terrestrial environment.

Keywords: bat; chondrocytes; developmental biology; evolutionary biology; growth plate; jerboa; mouse; rat; secondary ossification; whale.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

MX, PG, AH, JE, EM, LL, PN, SK, BS, AS, LS, BM, KG, SN, AA, AU, AK, AK, IA, PT, KF, MC, AS, CG, HK, MB, KC, PT, SS, IA, AE, AC No competing interests declared

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Evolutionary appearance of the SOC and its role in distributing octahedral stress.
(A–C) The proximal humeral metaphyses of Eusthenopteron (A), Seymouria (B), and Sciurus vulgaris (red squirrel) (C). The longitudinal trabeculae resulting from endochondral ossification at the base of the growth plate in adults are shown in pink, while the transverse trabeculae appear green. The longitudinal trabeculae (l.t.) are designated marrow processes invading the growth plate. (D) Phylogeny tree, illustrating the major changes in the evolution of long-bone epiphyses. The black arrows indicate the presence of a secondary calcified center (SC) or a secondary ossification center (SOC). (i) Estimated appearance of endochondral formation of long bones based on the fossil record to date; (ii) Cartilaginous epiphyses in long-bones; (iii) Hypothetical presence of an ancestral SCs in sauropsids; (iv) Hypothetical presence of an ancestral SOCs in synapsids. * indicates paraphyly within the group. (E) A synchrotron scan of a juvenile sparrow demonstrates the presence of SOC. 1, a virtual thin section of the proximal epiphysis. prox. ep., proximal epiphysis. (F) Deformation and distribution of octahedral stress from FEA simulation in different evolutionary taxa. Columns refer to (from left to right) ‘without SOC’ (representing i.e., fetal tetrapods and urodeles), ‘with SOC’ (representing i.e., synapsids including mammal), ‘stem tetrapods’ (representing i.e., juvenile stem tetrapods, chelonians, crocodilians), and archosaurs (representing i.e., birds and non-avian dinosaurs). For comparison of structural functionality, all situations used the same basic geometry and materials. The small arrows indicate the direction of loading. The supra-physiological loading level (3 MPa) was modeled. A hypertrophic zone free of bony elements is presented under each model for direct comparison.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.
Figure 1—figure supplement 1.. Development of articular and epiphyseal cartilage in rodents and salamanders.
(A–D) Representative safranin O and fast green staining of sections of the epiphyseal end of the tibia of mouse (A), rat (B), and the hind limb of salamander species Pleurodeles waltl (C) and Notophthalmus viridescens (D). The dashed red lines outline the SOC. Red arrowheads mark the zone of hypertrophic cells. Walking behavior is indicated according to our daily observations. Pleurodeles waltl is an Iberian newt that spends most of its life in water. Notophthalmus viridescens is a north American newt that has an aquatic larval, a terrestrial eft, and a semiaquatic adult stage.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.
Figure 1—figure supplement 2.. Deformation and distribution of comparison stress from FEA simulation in different evolutionary taxa.
Columns refer to (from left to right) ‘without SOC’ (representing i.e., fetal tetrapods and urodeles), ‘with SOC’ (representing i.e., synapsids including mammal), ‘stem tetrapods’ (representing i.e., juvenile stem tetrapods, chelonians, crocodilians), and archosaurs (representing i.e., birds and non-avian dinosaurs). For comparison of structural functionality, all situations used the same basic geometry and materials. The small arrows indicate the direction of loading. Supra-physiological loading level (3 MPa) was modeled. Hypertrophic zone free of bony elements is presented under each model for direct comparison. Hypertrophic zone, HZ.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Comparative analysis in bats.
(A) microCT image of a 1–3 days-old bat Pipistrellus pipistrellus. (A1) foot, with arrows pointing to growth plates, (A2) wing, with dashed blue lines outlining the areas of non-ossified cartilage. (B–C) Ossification of the autopod (B) and of the stylopod and zeugopod (C) in seven bat species at birth. (D–E) A generalized pattern of ossification of the autopod (D) and stylopod and zeugopod (E) of six bat species combined (Myotis lucifugus, Artibeus jamaicensis, Carollia perspicillata, Tadarida brasiliensis, Myotis austroriparius, and Myotis myotis).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Comparative analysis in jerboa.
(A–P) Alcian blue and alizarin red staining of the femur (A–D), humerus (E–H), metatarsal (I–L), and metacarpal (M–P) of Jaculus jaculus (three-toed jerboa) at various postnatal (P) time points. The dashed white lines outline the SOC. The gait pattern was derived from our weekly observations (see Figure 3—videos 1 and 2). (Q–R) Ossification of the autopod (Q) and stylopod and zeugopod (R) of Jaculus jaculus (three-toed jerboa) at various postnatal stages. Data are means ± SD, representing inter-individual variation, one-way ANOVA. In (Q–R), n = 2 jerboa analyzed. ns, not significant.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Comparative analysis in whales.
(A) Forelimb bones of the minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata. (B) Comparative anatomy of bony and cartilaginous epiphyses in the distal portion of the forelimbs of various cetacean whales: B1-B2 – early cetaceans; B3-B4 – baleen whales; B5-B10 – toothed whales. (B1) Maiacetus inuus, semi-aquatic from Eocene era (56–33.9 Mya), (B2) Dorudon atrox, fully-aquatic from Eocene era (B3) minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata from Miocene era (23–5.3 Mya) (B4) North Atlantic right whale Eubalaena glacialis, (B5) pilot whale Globicephala melas (B6) boto river dolphin Inia geoffrensis, (B7) narwhal Monodon monoceros, (B8) killer whale Orcinus orca, (B9) juvenile and (B10) subadult sperm whale Physeter catodon. (C) Sample image of an adult killer whale Orcinus orca (same species as B8) with X-ray images of the highlighted areas (C1 and C2) from the corresponding image on their left. (D) Sample (left) and X-ray (right) images of an adult beluga whale Delphinapterus leucas. (D1) Micro-CT reconstruction of the highlighted phalange joint. (E) CT image of an adult killer whale Orcinus orca and a virtual sagittal section of the metacarpal II demonstrating the absence of the SOC.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.. The SOC protects epiphyseal chondrocytes from apoptosis induced by mechanical stress.
(A–D) Quantification of propidium iodide- (PI) (A–B) and TUNEL- (C–D) positive cells in the growth plates of the tibia with and without SOCs loaded vertically (A, C) or at an angle (B, D). (E–F) Representative images and quantification of TUNEL staining (green) (E) and cleaved caspase-3 staining (red) (F) in the growth plates of loaded tibias with and without SOCs. DAPI was used for counterstaining (blue). Data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test. In (A–F), n = 3. The control and loaded tibia were from the same animal. VL, vertical load, AL, angled load. RZ and PZ, resting zone and proliferative zone combined, HZ, hypertrophic zone. ‘tibia with SOC’ and ‘tibia without SOC’ in the figure refer to tibias from 30-day-old mice and 10-day-old rats, respectively (see Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–B).
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.
Figure 5—figure supplement 1.. Establishing and characterizing SOC± model in relation to stifness and cell death.
(A) Mouse (30-day-old) and rat (10-day-old) tibia with and without a SOC, respectively, have similar physical dimensions of the epiphyses (d1, d2, h). (B) Representative images and quantification of the nanoindentation test of 30-day-old mice and 10-day-old rats. (C–D) The stiffness of bones with fully developed SOCs (tibia with SOC) and with immature SOCs (tibia without SOC) was measured at different loads and in both the vertical (C) and angled (D) direction. (E–J) Representative load/deformation (E–F) and stress/strain (G–H) curves of vertically (VL) (E, G) and angularly (AL) (F, H) loaded tibias with and without SOCs. (I–J) The elasticity of tibias with and without SOCs under vertical (I) and angled load (J). (K–L) The QPCR analysis of Indian hedgehog (Ihh) (K) and parathyroid hormone-related peptide (PTHrP) (L) levels in the epiphyseal end of tibia with and without SOCs. (M) Representative images of growth plates of tibias with and without SOCs fixed after dissection and prior loading. TUNEL staining (green) and nucleus counterstaining with DAPI (blue). (N) Fluorescent in situ hybridization of collagen type X (ColX) in the loaded growth plates of tibias with and without SOCs. VL, vertical load, AL, angled load. RZ and PZ, resting zone and proliferative zones, HZ, hypertrophic zone. (O) QPCR analysis of ColX level in the epiphyseal end of tibia with and without SOCs exposed to different loading. Data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test, except in (B) where Mann-Whitney U-test was used. In (A), n = 23 for ‘Mouse’ and n = 15 for ‘Rat’. In (B), n = 5 for ‘Mouse’ and n = 4 for ‘Rat’. In (C), n = 10 for ‘tibia with SOC’ at all loads; n = 9 for ‘tibia without SOC’ at 0–1N and 1–4N, n = 4 for>4N. In (D), n = 11 for ‘tibia with SOC’ at all loads; n = 8 for ‘tibia without SOC’ at all loads. In (I–L, O), n = 3. ns, not significant.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2.
Figure 5—figure supplement 2.. Death of the growth plate chondrocytes upon various loading in the presence and absence of the SOC.
(A–B) Representative images and quantification of the distribution of propidium iodide (PI)-positive cells in the growth plates of tibia with (A) and without a SOC (B) loaded vertically or angularly. During the end of culture period, bones were incubated with PI, which penetrates only into dead cells (red). Representative pictures (images) and quantifications (graphs) are shown. DAPI (blue) counterstaining of all nucleus was done on the fixed tissue sections. RZ and PZ, resting zone and proliferative zones, HZ, hypertrophic zone. ‘tibia with SOC’ and ‘tibia without SOC’ refer to tibias from 30-day-old mice and 10-day-old rats, respectively (see Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–B). Data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test. In (A–B), n = 3.
Figure 5—figure supplement 3.
Figure 5—figure supplement 3.. YAP/p73 activation the growth plate chondrocytes upon loading.
(A–C) Immunostaining and quantification of YAP (A), p73 (B), and YAP + p73 double-positive cells (C) in the growth plates of loaded tibias with and without SOCs loaded vertically (VL) and angularly (AL). RZ and HZ, resting zone and proliferative zone, HZ, hypertrophic zone. ‘tibia with SOC’ and ‘tibia without SOC’ refer to tibias from 30-day-old mice and 10-day-old rats, respectively (see Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–B). Data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test. In (A–C), n = 3.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.. Hypertrophic cells are the most sensitive cell type in response to mechanical stress.
(A–D) Comparison of the extent of cell death between resting+proliferative zones (RZ and PZ) and hypertrophic zone (HZ) of the vertically and angularly loaded growth plates with (A, C) and without (B, D) SOCs as assessed by PI staining (A–B) and TUNEL (C–D). (E to H) Distribution of immunohistological staining along the longitudinal axis for cleaved caspase-3 staining (E–F) and YAP and p73 double staining (G–H) of the vertically and angularly loaded tibia with (E, G) and without (F, H) SOCs. (I) Representative images and quantification of propidium iodide (PI) staining (upper panel) and cleaved caspase-3 staining (lower panel) in the growth plates of vertically or angularly 0.2N loaded tibias without SOCs. The control and loaded tibia were from the same animal. DAPI was used for counterstaining (blue) in (I). Data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test. In (A–I), n = 3. ns, not significant. ‘tibia with SOC’ and ‘tibia without SOC’ refer to tibias from 30-day-old mice and 10-day-old rats, respectively (see Figure 5—figure supplement 1A–B).
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.
Figure 6—figure supplement 1.. Distribution of YAP/p73 activation along longitudinal bone axis and the effect of loading on chondrocyte proliferation.
(A–D) Comparison of YAP (A–B) and p73 (C–D) staining between the resting plus proliferative zones (RZ and PZ) and hypertrophic zone (HZ) in the growth plates of tibias with (A, C) and without (B, D) SOCs. (E–F) Representative images and quantification of the ki67 staining in the growth plates of tibias with (F) and without (E) SOCs. Data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test. In (A–F), n = 3. ns, not significant.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.. SOC size is negatively correlated with load-induced chondrocyte death in rat tibia growth plate.
(A) Representative images of the distribution of propidium iodide (PI)-positive cells in the growth plates of rat tibia with the same vertical pressure of 0.023 Mpa (equivalent to the load of 0.2N for postnatal day 5 rat tibia). (B) Representative images of safranin O and fast green staining of the corresponding rat tibia to illustrate the development of SOC. (C–E) Quantification of PI-positive total growth plate chondrocytes (C), SOC size (D) and PI-positive hypertrophic chondrocytes (E) in the loaded rat tibia at different ages. (F–G) Correlation analysis of PI-positive total growth plate chondrocytes (F) or PI-positive hypertrophic chondrocytes (G) with SOC size. Semilog line of nonlinear regression curve fit was used (red line). During the end of the culture period, bones were incubated with PI, which penetrates only into dead cells (red). DAPI (blue) counterstaining of all nucleus was done on the fixed tissue sections. RZ and PZ, resting zone and proliferative zones, HZ, hypertrophic zone. Data are means ± SD, n = 6. Two independent experiments were performed with three animals per time point per experiment. Each data point in (F–G) represents one animal.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.. Inhibition of the SOC size in vivo is associated with increased epiphyseal chondrocyte apoptosis.
Size of the SOC was inhibited either pharmacologically employing axitinib (A–D) or genetically employing activation of Gnas (E, F). (A–B) Representative histology images of the tibia epiphysis (A) and quantification of the SOC size (B) of wild type mice injected with axitinib at various time periods. P refers to postnatal day. (C–D) Representative images (C) and quantification of TUNEL staining (green) (D) in the hypertrophic cells of the tibia growth plate of the axitinib injected mice. (E–F) Quantification of SOC size (E) and TUNEL staining (F) of the hypertrophic cells in the growth plates of stopGnasR201H (Control) and Prx-Cre:GnasR201H (Gnas-Tg) mice. DAPI was used for counterstaining (blue) in (C). Data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test. In (A–F), n = 3. ns, not significant.
Figure 9.
Figure 9.. Low stiffness of hypertrophic chondrocytes renders them sensitive to mechanical stress.
(A) Quantification of the SOC size of postnatal day 28 Sik3F/F (Control) and Col2a1-Cre:Sik3F/F (Sik3-cKO) mice. (B) Representative images and quantification of TUNEL staining (green) between the lateral and middle parts of Sik3-cKO mice. DAPI was used for counterstaining (blue). HZ, hypertrophic zone. In (A–B), data are means ± SD, two-tailed Student’s t-test, n = 3 for ‘Control’ and n = 5 animals for ‘Sik3-cKO’ whereas each dot represents one histological section analyzed. (C) Schematic illustration of a section plan and loading directions in relation to the quantitative analysis of cell death distribution in the lateral-medial direction presented in (D–E). The growth plate is divided into three equal parts, (left, middle, and right) in relationship to the angle at which the load is applied (green or red arrows). (D–E) Quantification of propidium iodide (PI)-positive chondrocytes in the resting and proliferative zones and hypertrophic zone of tibias with (D) and without (E) SOCs subjected to an angled load (AL, green arrow, always applied from the right). Data are means ± SD, one-way ANOVA. **, p<0.001 and ***, p<0.0001 in comparison with the left portion. ns, not significant. The black and white asterisks indicate the significance for the resting and proliferative and hypertrophic zones, respectively. (F) Principal compressive stress from FEA modeling with physiological loading level. The small arrows indicate the direction of loading. The two-headed curved arrows indicate areas for comparison. (G) Typical force curves for hypertrophic and proliferating chondrocytes obtained by atomic force microscopy. (H) Comparison of the elastic moduli of hypertrophic and proliferating chondrocytes.
Figure 9—figure supplement 1.
Figure 9—figure supplement 1.. The lateral-medial distribution of cell death upon angular loading.
(A–B) Quantification of PI-positive chondrocytes in relation to the lateral-medial direction of the growth plate of tibia loaded vertically with (A) and without (B) an SOC (see Figure 4A for details). (C–F) Quantification of TUNEL-positive chondrocytes in relation to the lateral-medial direction of the growth plate of the tibia with (C–D) and without (E–F) a SOC subjected to angular (C, E) and vertical (D, F) loading. (G–J) Quantification of the distribution of YAP-positive chondrocytes in relation to the lateral-medial direction within the resting and proliferative and hypertrophic zones of the growth plate of angularly (G, I) and vertically (H, J) loaded tibia with (G–H) and without (I–J) an SOC. Only nuclearized active YAP as demonstrated in k-l was quantified. The red and green arrows indicate the direction of loading (see the legend in Figure 4a for more details). Data are means ± SD, one-way ANOVA. **, p<0.001 and ***, p<0.0001. In (A–J), n = 3. ns, not significant. The black and white asterisks indicate p-values for the resting and proliferative and hypertrophic zones, respectively. (K–L) Immunostaining of active (nuclear) and inactive YAP in mouse (K) and rat (L) chondrocytes. (M) Hydrostatic compressive stress on epiphyseal plates from FEA modeling with physiological loading level. The small arrows indicate the direction of loading and the two-headed curved arrows indicate areas for comparison.
Figure 10.
Figure 10.. Unloading of the hindlimbs in growing rats by either sciatic nerve resection or by tape restriction.
Sciatic nerve resection (A–E) or leg restriction with a kinesiology tape (F–J) was done at 10 days of age and both hindlimbs (manipulated and intact) were analyzed at day 23. For (A–E) sham-operated littermates were used as a control (only right hindlimb was utilized), whereas for (F–J) unmanipulated littermates were used as a control (only right hindlimb was utilized). (A–C, F–H) Representative Safranin O and Fast Green stained images of the knee joint. Black dash lines outline the SOC and solid lines outline the epiphysis area in A and F. Quantification of SOC size (normalized to total epiphysis size) (D, I) and bone mass (within the primary spongiosa region) (E, J). Bars are means ±95% confidential interval and every dot represent an individual animal, two-tailed Student’s t-test. ns, not significant.
Figure 10—figure supplement 1.
Figure 10—figure supplement 1.. Footprint analysis revealed a clear difference between the right hindlimb of the sciatic nerve-resected and the sham-operated rats.
Figure 10—figure supplement 2.
Figure 10—figure supplement 2.. Cartilage calcification but absence of the SOC formation in the newt growing on land.
(A) Alcian blue and von Kossa staining of the humerus of the newt (Notophthalmus viridescens) revealed calcified chondrocytes at the post metamorphosis transient land stage. (B–C) TUNEL (B) and DNA replication licensing factor MCM2 (C) staining of the same salamander species revealed no notiecable differences in apoptotic and proliferating chondrocytes at the three developmental stages.

References

    1. Adams RA, Thibault KM. Ontogeny and evolution of the hindlimb and calcar: assessing phylogenetic trends. Ontogeny, Functional Ecology, and Evolution of Bats. 2000;10:316–332. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511541872.010. - DOI
    1. Alexander RM. Mechanics of posture and gait of some large dinosaurs. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 1985;83:1–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1985.tb00871.x. - DOI
    1. Anderson JF, Hall-Martin A, Russell DA. Long-bone circumference and weight in mammals, birds and dinosaurs. Journal of Zoology. 1985;207:53–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.1985.tb04915.x. - DOI
    1. Ashley-Ross M. Hindlimb kinematics during terrestrial locomotion in a salamander (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) The Journal of Experimental Biology. 1994;193:255–283. - PubMed
    1. Barreto C, Albrecht RM, Bjorling DE, Horner JR, Wilsman NJ. Evidence of the growth plate and the growth of long bones in juvenile dinosaurs. Science. 1993;262:2020–2023. doi: 10.1126/science.262.5142.2020. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types