The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation
- PMID: 33064092
- PMCID: PMC7434075
- DOI: 10.2196/15101
The Participatory Zeitgeist in Health Care: It is Time for a Science of Participation
Abstract
Participation in health care is currently the zeitgeist/spirit of our times. A myriad of practices characterizes this "participatory Zeitgeist" in contemporary health care, which range from patients and professionals collaborating as partners in service delivery and treatment decision-making, to crowdsourced cures and participation in online communities, to using health apps, to involvement in health care quality improvement initiatives for systems redesign using coproduction and co-design methods. To date, patient engagement and participation in online communities and the use of apps have received a good deal of attention in participatory medicine. However, there has been a less critical examination of participation in health care planning, design, delivery, and improvement. In the face of what Thomas Kuhn called a scientific revolution, we are presented with the opportunity to re-examine some of the assumptions underpinning participation in health care and some of the emerging anomalies and weaknesses in the current science. This re-examination will allow the development of a new paradigm, a science of participation. In this science, we can systematically test, refine, and advance participation in health care to build a unifying language and theories from across the interdisciplinary fields of participatory design, medicine, and research to develop and test models to explain impacts and outcomes. A science of participation will allow the emergent and unexplained facts to be addressed in the current participatory mood of health care planning, design, delivery, and improvement.
Keywords: co-design; coproduction; health care improvement; participation; participatory methods; quality improvement; theory of science.
©Victoria Jane Palmer. Originally published in Journal of Participatory Medicine (http://jopm.jmir.org), 10.01.2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
References
-
- Theo J. The Politics of Time: Zeitgeist in early nineteenth-century political discourse. Contributions to the History of Concepts. 2014 Jun 01;9(1):24–49. doi: 10.3167/choc.2014.090102. - DOI
-
- Palmer VJ, Weavell W, Callander R, Piper D, Richard L, Maher L, Boyd H, Herrman H, Furler J, Gunn J, Iedema R, Robert G. The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement. Med Humanit. 2019 Sep 28;45(3):247–257. doi: 10.1136/medhum-2017-011398. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29954854 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Reinelt J. Zeitgeist. Contemporary Theatre Review. 2013 Feb;23(1):90–92. doi: 10.1080/10486801.2013.765132. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
