Associations of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing in the US Population: Results from a National Cross-Sectional Survey
- PMID: 33064229
- DOI: 10.1007/s10900-020-00923-8
Associations of Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Testing in the US Population: Results from a National Cross-Sectional Survey
Abstract
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing is one of the standard screening methods for prostate cancer (PC); however, a high proportion of men with abnormal PSA findings lack evidence for PC and may undergo unnecessary treatment. Furthermore, little is known about the prevalence of PSA testing for US men, after the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommended against routine PSA screening in 2012. Our objectives were to: (1) examine the self-reported patterns of PSA testing following a change in the USPSTF prostate cancer screening recommendations and (2) to determine the associated socio-demographic factors. Data were from the 2010 and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys. Men were ages ≥ 40 years and responded to the question "Ever had a PSA test?". Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine PSA testing prevalence in 2010 and 2015, and their associated socio-demographic factors. The analytic sample contained 15,372 men. A majority (75.2%) identified as non-Hispanic (NHW) and 14.2% were foreign-born. Those surveyed in 2015 were less likely to report ever having had a PSA test when compared to those in 2010. Compared to US-born and older NHW men, PSA testing was statistically significantly lower among foreign-born men and men belonging to all other racial categories. Fewer men reported PSA testing following the USPSTF 2012 recommendations. Associated socio-demographic factors included nativity, age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment and type of health insurance. Further studies are required to elucidate our findings and their health implications for the US native and foreign-born population.
Keywords: Foreign-born men; Prostate-specific antigen test; Socio-demographic factors.
Similar articles
-
Shared decision making and prostate-specific antigen based prostate cancer screening following the 2018 update of USPSTF screening guideline.Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021 Mar;24(1):77-80. doi: 10.1038/s41391-020-0227-1. Epub 2020 Apr 15. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2021. PMID: 32296126
-
Decrease in Prostate Cancer Testing Following the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) Recommendations.J Am Board Fam Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;28(4):491-3. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.04.150062. J Am Board Fam Med. 2015. PMID: 26152440 Free PMC article.
-
Prostate and Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake among US and Foreign-Born Males: Evidence from the 2015 NHIS Survey.J Community Health. 2017 Jun;42(3):612-623. doi: 10.1007/s10900-016-0296-1. J Community Health. 2017. PMID: 27838809
-
Relevance of total PSA and free PSA prescriptions.Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2018 Dec 1;76(6):659-663. doi: 10.1684/abc.2018.1392. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2018. PMID: 30543191 Review. English.
-
Benefits and harms of prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer: an evidence update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.Ann Intern Med. 2008 Aug 5;149(3):192-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-3-200808050-00009. Ann Intern Med. 2008. PMID: 18678846 Review.
Cited by
-
Patterns of Care and Treatment Outcomes Among Men Diagnosed with Prostate Cancer from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds: A Scoping Review.Curr Oncol Rep. 2025 May;27(5):552-571. doi: 10.1007/s11912-025-01660-8. Epub 2025 Mar 29. Curr Oncol Rep. 2025. PMID: 40156701 Free PMC article.
-
Association of cigarette use with risk of prostate cancer among US males: a cross-sectional study from NHANES 1999-2020.BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;25(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21863-9. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 39948519 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence and associated risk factors of prostate cancer among a large Chinese population.Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 1;14(1):26338. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77863-z. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 39487298 Free PMC article.
-
Association of cigarette smoking habits with the risk of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 15;23(1):1150. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-16085-w. BMC Public Health. 2023. PMID: 37316851 Free PMC article.
-
Association of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening With Prostate Cancer-Specific Mortality.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 May 2;5(5):e2211869. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.11869. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35576008 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R. L., Torre, L. A., & Jemal, A. (2018). Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(6), 394–424.
-
- American Cancer Society. (2020). Cancer facts & figures 2020. Atlanta: American Cancer Society.
-
- Powell, I. J., Bock, C. H., Ruterbusch, J. J., & Sakr, W. (2010). Evidence supports a faster growth rate and/or earlier transformation to clinically significant prostate cancer in black than in white American men, and influences racial progression and mortality disparity. The Journal of Urology., 183(5), 1792–1797. - PubMed
-
- Chornokur, G., Dalton, K., Borysova, M. E., & Kumar, N. B. (2011). Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment, and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate, 71(9), 985–997. - PubMed
-
- Obertova, Z., Brown, C., Holmes, M., & Lawrenson, R. (2012). Prostate cancer incidence and mortality in rural men—A systematic review of the literature. Rural and Remote Health, 12(2), 2039. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous