Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1987;47(1):17-21.
doi: 10.1159/000184450.

Lipoprotein lipid abnormalities in healthy renal transplant recipients: persistence of low HDL2 cholesterol

Lipoprotein lipid abnormalities in healthy renal transplant recipients: persistence of low HDL2 cholesterol

W H Ettinger et al. Nephron. 1987.

Abstract

There is disagreement about the prevalence and character of lipoprotein lipid abnormalities in renal transplant patients. To test the hypothesis that these abnormalities may be related to the coexistence of medical conditions and medications which affect lipoprotein metabolism in these patients, triglyceride (TG), cholesterol (C), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) and HDL-C subfractions were measured in 26 transplanted patients (10 F/16 M), control subjects matched for age, sex, weight and race and uremic patients being treated with hemodialysis. Female transplant recipients had higher TG (181 +/- 47 vs. 68 +/- 6 mg/dl; p less than 0.001), C (242 +/- 19 vs. 165 +/- 9 mg/dl; p less than 0.01), and low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-C (155 +/- 15 vs. 93 +/- 8 mg/dl; p less than 0.01) than controls. Levels of HDL-C were similar, but HDL2 was significantly lower in the transplanted patients (9 +/- 2 vs. 19 +/- 2 mg/dl; p less than 0.01). Compared to the uremic patients, female transplanted patients had higher C (242 +/- 19 vs. 178 +/- 22 mg/dl; p less than 0.01), LDL-C (155 +/- 15 vs. 94 +/- 18 mg/dl; p less than 0.01), HDL-C (51 +/- 5 vs. 32 +/- 4 mg/dl; p less than 0.001) and HDL3-C (42 +/- 4 vs. 26 +/- 2 mg/dl; p less than 0.001); however, HDL2-C levels were not significantly different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources