Implementation Strategies and the Uptake of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
- PMID: 33064387
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003944
Implementation Strategies and the Uptake of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: To identify the implementation strategies used in World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) uptake in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); examine any association of implementation strategies with implementation effectiveness; and to assess the clinical impact.
Background: The SSC is associated with improved surgical outcomes but effective implementation strategies are poorly understood.
Methods: We searched the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO from June 2008 to February 2019 and included primary studies on SSC use in LMICs. Coprimary objectives were identification of implementation strategies used and evaluation of associations between strategies and implementation effectiveness. To assess the clinical impact of the SSC, we estimated overall pooled relative risks for mortality and morbidity. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42018100034).
Results: We screened 1562 citations and included 47 papers. Median number of discrete implementation strategies used per study was 4 (IQR: 1-14, range 0-28). No strategies were identified in 12 studies. SSC implementation occurred with high penetration (81%, SD 20%) and fidelity (85%, SD 13%), but we did not detect an association between implementation strategies and implementation outcomes. SSC use was associated with a reduction in mortality (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.67-0.89), all complications (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.45-0.71) and infectious complications (RR 0.44; 95% CI 0.37-0.52).
Conclusions: The SSC is used with high fidelity and penetration is associated with improved clinical outcomes in LMICs. Implementation appears well supported by a small number of tailored strategies. Further application of implementation science methodology is required among the global surgical community.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. To Err Is Human: Building a Safer Health System, Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS editors Washington, DC, The National Academies Press, 2000.
-
- Howell AM, Panesar SS, Burns EM, et al. Reducing the burden of surgical harm: a systematic review of the interventions used to reduce adverse events in surgery. Ann Surg 2014; 259:630–641.
-
- Montroy J, Breau RH, Cnossen S, et al. Change in adverse events after enrollment in the national surgical quality improvement program: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0146254.
-
- Biccard BM, Madiba TE, Kluyts HL, et al. Perioperative patient outcomes in the African Surgical Outcomes Study: a 7-day prospective observational cohort study. Lancet 2018; 391:1589–1598.
-
- GlobalSurg CollaborativeSurgical site infection after gastrointestinal surgery in high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective, international, multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2018; 18:516–525.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical