Chemoradiation in Stage IIIB Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Review of the Zimbabwean Experience
- PMID: 33064579
- PMCID: PMC7605367
- DOI: 10.1200/JGO.19.00412
Chemoradiation in Stage IIIB Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Review of the Zimbabwean Experience
Abstract
Purpose: Cervical cancer remains the leading cause of cancer morbidity and mortality among Zimbabwean women. Many patients present with stage IIIB disease. Although definitive concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) is the standard of care, there is a paucity of data on the effect(s) of this intervention in resource-constrained and high HIV-prevalence settings. We investigated the differences in CCRT initiation practices, tolerability, and outcomes in this group.
Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from hospital records for patients with stage IIIB disease who were treated over a 2-year period at Parirenyatwa Group of Hospitals. Outcome measures were documented treatment-related adverse events and early clinical tumor response.
Results: One hundred twenty-eight (37%) of 346 patients received CCRT, and 65 (51%) of 128 patients were infected with HIV. CCRT was prescribed mostly in patients with less extensive disease-not involving lower third vaginal walls, minimal pelvic sidewall involvement (P = .002), and higher CD4+ count (P = .02). Eighteen percent of recorded adverse events were high grade (≥ 3). One patient did not complete treatment, and 68.5% achieved complete clinical tumor response at 3 months post-CCRT. A higher proportion of complete clinical tumor response was noted in those patients who were young, HIV uninfected, had less extensive disease, CD4+ of 500 cells/mm3 or greater, received four or more cycles of chemotherapy, received brachytherapy, and had no treatment breaks.
Conclusion: The study revealed that the use of CCRT to treat stage IIIB cervical cancer is low in Zimbabwe. Although several factors contribute, low CCRT uptake is mostly attributed to financial barriers. Well-selected patients tolerate the treatment and have good early clinical tumor response as expected. The role of CCRT for this patient group (and methods to make it available in resource-limited settings) must be further evaluated.
Conflict of interest statement
The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated unless otherwise noted. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to
Open Payments is a public database containing information reported by companies about payments made to US-licensed physicians (
No potential conflicts of interest were reported.
Figures
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:394–424. [Erratum: CA Cancer J Clin 70:313, 2020] - PubMed
-
- Datta NR, Stutz E, Liu M, et al. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervix cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol. 2017;145:374–385. - PubMed
-
- Chokunonga E, Borok MZ, Chirenje ZM, et al. Pattern of Cancer in Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe National Cancer Registry 2016 Annual Report. Harare, Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe National Cancer Registry; 2016.
-
- Moodley M, Moodley J, Kleinschmidt I. Invasive cervical cancer and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection: A South African perspective. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2001;11:194–197. - PubMed
-
- Rose PG. Chemoradiotherapy: The new standard care for invasive cervical cancer. Drugs. 2000;60:1239–1244. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
