Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Aug;27(4):965-975.
doi: 10.1111/jep.13496. Epub 2020 Oct 16.

Interventions to increase appointment attendance in safety net health centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Erika L Crable  1   2 , Dea L Biancarelli  1   2 , Marisa Aurora  2 , Mari-Lynn Drainoni  1   2   3   4 , Allan J Walkey  1   2   5
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Interventions to increase appointment attendance in safety net health centers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Erika L Crable et al. J Eval Clin Pract. 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Rationale, aims and objectives: Missed appointments are a persistent problem across healthcare settings, and result in negative outcomes for providers and patients. We aimed to review and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to reduce missed appointments in safety net settings.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review of interventions reported in three electronic databases. Data extraction and quality assessment were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies were analyzed qualitatively to describe intervention types. A random effects model was used to measure the pooled relative risk of appointment adherence across interventions in the meta-analysis.

Results: Thirty-four studies met inclusion criteria for the qualitative synthesis, and 21 studies reported sufficient outcome data for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Qualitative analysis classified nine types of interventions used to increase attendance; however, application of each intervention type varied widely between studies. Across all study types (N = 12 000), RR was 1.08, (95% CI 1.03, 1.13) for any intervention used to increase appointment attendance. No single intervention was clearly effective: facilitated appointment scheduling [RR = 3.31 (95% CI: 0.30, 37.13)], financial incentives [RR = 1.88 (0.73, 4.82)] case management/patient navigator [RR = 1.09, (0.96, 1.24)], text messages [RR = 1.02 (0.96, 1.08)], transportation, [RR = 1.05 (0.98, 1.13)], telephone reminder calls [RR 1.12, (0.87, 1.45)], in-person referrals, [RR = 1.01 (0.90, 1.13)], patient contracts [RR = 0.87 (0.52, 1.46)] or combined strategies, [RR = 1.16 (1.03, 1.32)]. No strategy was clearly superior to others, p interaction = .50.

Conclusions: Strategies to improve appointment adherence in safety net hospitals varied widely and were only modestly effective. Further research harmonizing intervention delivery within each strategy and comparing strategies with the most potential for success is needed.

Keywords: Medicaid; appointment attendance; no-shows; safety-net.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Kheirkhah P, Feng Q, Travis LM, et al. Prevalence, predictors and economic consequences of no-shows. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;16(1):13.
    1. Dantas LF, Fleck JL, Cyrino Oliveira FL, Hamacher S. No-shows in appointment scheduling-a systematic literature review. Health Policy (New York). 2018;122(4):412-421.
    1. Hixon AL, Chapman RW, Nuovo J. Failure to keep clinic appointments: implications for residency education and productivity. Fam Med. 1999;31(9):627-630.
    1. Hwang AS, Atlas SJ, Cronin P, et al. Appointment “no-shows” are an independent predictor of subsequent quality of care and resource utilization outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2015;30(10):1426-1433.
    1. Institute of Medicine. In: Ein Lewin M, Altman S, eds. America's health care safety net: intact but endangered. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2000.

LinkOut - more resources