Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 15.
doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000003748. Online ahead of print.

Repeat Application of Ischemic Preconditioning Improves Maximal 1,000-m Kayak Ergometer Performance in a Simulated Competition Format

Affiliations

Repeat Application of Ischemic Preconditioning Improves Maximal 1,000-m Kayak Ergometer Performance in a Simulated Competition Format

Samuel L Halley et al. J Strength Cond Res. .

Abstract

Halley, SL, Peeling, P, Brown, H, Sim, M, Mallabone, J, Dawson, B, and Binnie, MJ. Repeat application of ischemic preconditioning improves maximal 1,000-m kayak ergometer performance in a simulated competition format. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2020-This study examined the effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) on repeat 1,000-m kayak ergometer time-trial (TT) performance, completed in a simulated competition format. Eight well-trained male kayak athletes performed 3 experimental trials, each consisting of two 1,000-m TTs separated by 80 minutes (TT 1 and TT 2). Trials included; (a) IPC (4 × 5 minutes 220 mm Hg alternating bilateral leg occlusion) 40 minutes before TT 1 only (IPC1); (b) IPC 40 minutes before TT 1 and 20 minutes before TT 2 (IPC2); and (c) no IPC (CON). Time, power, stroke rate, and expired gas variables (V[Combining Dot Above]O2 and accumulated oxygen deficit) were measured throughout each TT; blood gas variables (blood lactate, partial pressure of oxygen and blood pH) and rating of perceived exertion were measured before and after each effort. Physiological, perceptual, and physical measures were analyzed via a repeated measures analysis of variance with the level of significance set at p ≤ 0.05. There were large improvements in completion time for TT 1 in IPC1 (d = 1.24 ± 0.68, p < 0.05) and IPC2 (d = 1.53 ± 0.99, p < 0.05) versus CON. There was also a large improvement in TT 2 completion time in IPC2 versus CON (d = 1.26 ± 1.13, p = 0.03) whereas, IPC1 and CON were indifferent (d = 0.3 ± 0.54, p = 0.23). This study showed that a repeat application of IPC in a simulated competition format may offer further benefit in comparison to a single pre-exercise application of IPC.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources