Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec 1:277:908-913.
doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.067. Epub 2020 Sep 2.

Validity of retrospectively-reported depressive episodes

Affiliations

Validity of retrospectively-reported depressive episodes

Samantha L Birk et al. J Affect Disord. .

Abstract

Background: Depression and other psychopathology are often assessed retrospectively. Few studies have evaluated the validity of these reports by comparing prospectively-assessed symptoms to retrospective reports during the same time period.

Methods: This study utilized a subset of participants (n = 68) from the Oregon Adolescent Depression Project who completed at least one mailer assessment of depressive symptoms during a retrospectively-reported depressive episode. Participants completed up to seven mailer assessments of depression and suicidal ideation and diagnostic assessments that included retrospectively-reported depressive episodes that coincided with the mailer assessments.

Results: Multilevel linear models examined differences in depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation during and between retrospectively-reported depressive episodes. Results showed that individuals reported significantly higher levels of depression and suicidal ideation for retrospectively-reported depressive episodes compared to when they were not in depressive episodes. In addition, the average level of depressive symptoms endorsed during retrospectively-reported depressive episodes reached established clinical cut-offs.

Limitations: Although we were able to determine whether symptoms during retrospectively-reported depressive episodes approached clinical cut-offs, we were unable to examine whether symptoms met criteria for depressive episodes. Additionally, we could not examine whether episode severity related to recall ability, and other forms of psychopathology were not assessed.

Conclusion: These findings provide critical evidence for the validity of retrospectively-reported depressive episodes. Future research should examine whether these findings generalize across varying recall periods and retrospective assessments for other psychopathology.

Keywords: Depression; Self-report; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Oregon Adolescent Depression Project study timeline. 1KSADS = version of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children that combined features of the Epidemiologic version (KSADS-E; Orvaschel, Puig-Antich, Chambers, Tabrizi, & Johnson, 1982) and included additional items to derive diagnoses of past and current psychiatric disorders in the revised DSM-III (American Psychiatric Association, 1987); 2HRSD = Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (Hamilton, 1960); 3Battery of self-report measures included measures of stress, current depressive symptoms, other psychopathology (i.e., internalizing and externalizing), pessimism, attributions, self-consciousness, self-esteem, self-rated social competence, emotional reliance, future goals, coping skills, social support, interpersonal factors, physical health and illness, maturation, and other variables; 4LIFE = Longitudinal Interval Follow-Up Evaluation (Shapiro & Keller, 1979); 5CESD = Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (Radloff, 1977); 6Perceived Social Support Questionnaire (PSS; Procidano & Heller, 1983). *In the Oregon Adolescent Depression Project, annual mailer assessments spanned ages 18 to 32, thus starting before T3 and ending after T4. However, for the current study, only mailer assessments that occurred after T3 and before T4 were included in the study.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. APA: Washington, DC.
    1. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, & Walker S (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Bonde JPE (2008). Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: a systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Occupational and environmental medicine, 65, 438–445. doi:10.1136/oem.2007.038430 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bromet EJ, Dunn LO, Connell MM, Dew MA, & Schulberg HC (1986). Long-term reliability of diagnosing lifetime major depression in a community sample. Archives of General Psychiatry, 43, 435–440. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800050033004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Carlson GA & Cantwell DP (1982). Suicidal behavior and depression in children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of child Psychiatry, 21, 361–368. doi:10.1016/s0002-7138(09)60939-0 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types