Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2021 Jan;48(1):126-144.
doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13390. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Post-extraction dimensional changes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Emilio Couso-Queiruga et al. J Clin Periodontol. 2021 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: To analyse the evidence pertaining to post-extraction dimensional changes in the alveolar ridge after unassisted socket healing.

Materials and methods: The protocol of this PRISMA-compliant systematic review (SRs) was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020178857). A literature search to identify studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria was conducted. Data of interest were extracted. Qualitative and random-effects meta-analyses were performed if at least two studies with comparable features and variables reported the same outcome of interest.

Results: Twenty-eight articles were selected, of which 20 could be utilized for the conduction of quantitative analyses by method of assessment (i.e. clinical vs radiographic measurements) and location (i.e. non-molar vs molar sites). Pooled estimates revealed that mean horizontal, vertical mid-facial and mid-lingual ridge reduction assessed clinically in non-molar sites was 2.73 mm (95% CI: 2.36-3.11), 1.71 mm (95% CI: 1.30-2.12) and 1.44 mm (95% CI: 0.78-2.10), respectively. Mean horizontal, vertical mid-facial and mid-lingual ridge reduction assessed radiographically in non-molar sites was 2.54 mm (95% CI: 1.97-3.11), 1.65 mm (95% CI: 0.42-2.88) and 0.87 mm (95% CI: 0.36-1.38), respectively. Mean horizontal, vertical mid-facial and mid-lingual ridge reduction assessed radiographically in molar sites was 3.61 mm (95% CI: 3.24-3.98), 1.46 mm (95% CI: 0.73-2.20) and 1.20 mm (95% CI: 0.56-1.83), respectively.

Conclusion: A variable amount of alveolar bone resorption occurs after unassisted socket healing depending on tooth type.

Keywords: alveolar bone loss; bone resorption; tooth extraction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Aimetti, M., Romano, F., Griga, F. B., & Godio, L. (2009). Clinical and histologic healing of human extraction sockets filled with calcium sulfate. International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, 24(5), 902-909.
    1. Al Yafi, F., Alchawaf, B., & Nelson, K. (2019). What is the optimum for alveolar ridge preservation? Dental Clinics of North America, 63(3), 399-418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.007
    1. Annunziata, M., Guida, L., Nastri, L., Piccirillo, A., Sommese, L., & Napoli, C. (2018). The role of autologous platelet concentrates in alveolar socket preservation: A systematic review. Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, 45(3), 195-203. https://doi.org/10.1159/000488061
    1. Araujo, M. G., da Silva, J. C. C., de Mendonca, A. F., & Lindhe, J. (2015). Ridge alterations following grafting of fresh extraction sockets in man. A randomized clinical trial. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 26(4), 407-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.12366
    1. Araujo, M. G., & Lindhe, J. (2005). Dimensional ridge alterations following tooth extraction. An experimental study in the dog. Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 32(2), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2005.00642.x

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources