Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;112(20):1787-1801.
doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1822. Epub 2020 Oct 17.

A multi-country study of prevalence and early childhood mortality among children with omphalocele

Affiliations

A multi-country study of prevalence and early childhood mortality among children with omphalocele

Wendy N Nembhard et al. Birth Defects Res. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Omphalocele is the second most common abdominal birth defect and often occurs with other structural and genetic defects. The objective of this study was to determine omphalocele prevalence, time trends, and mortality during early childhood, by geographical region, and the presence of associated anomalies.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study with 23 birth defect surveillance systems in 18 countries who are members of the International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research that submitted data on cases ascertained from 2000 through 2012, approximately 16 million pregnancies were surveyed that resulted in live births, stillbirths, or elective terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomalies (ETOPFA) and cases with omphalocele were included. Overall prevalence and mortality rates for specific ages were calculated (day of birth, neonatal, infant, and early childhood). We used Kaplan-Meier estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) to calculate cumulative mortality and joinpoint regression for time trend analyses.

Results: The prevalence of omphalocele was 2.6 per 10,000 births (95% CI: 2.5, 2.7) and showed no temporal change from 2000-2012 (average annual percent change = -0.19%, p = .52). The overall mortality rate was 32.1% (95% CI: 30.2, 34.0). Most deaths occurred during the neonatal period and among children with multiple anomalies or syndromic omphalocele. Prevalence and mortality varied by registry type (e.g., hospital- vs. population-based) and inclusion or exclusion of ETOPFA.

Conclusions: The prevalence of omphalocele showed no temporal change from 2000-2012. Approximately one-third of children with omphalocele did not survive early childhood with most deaths occurring in the neonatal period.

Keywords: mortality; omphalocele; prevalence; registry; surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves up to age five years for all liveborn cases with omphalocele in ten birth defects surveillance systems with linkage to death certificates by continent, 2000-2012 1a: North America 1b Europe: Czech, Italy Lombardy, Italy Tuscany, Malta, Sweden, UK Wales
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves up to age five for isolated, multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) and syndromic omphalocele in six surveillance systems with available data, 2000-2012 2a Isolated Cases: Italy Lombardy, Italy Tuscany, Sweden, UK Wales, USA Utah 2b Omphalocele with Multiple Congenital Anomalies: Italy Lombardy, Italy Tuscany, Sweden, UK Wales, USA Utah 2c. Syndromic omphalocele: Czech Republic1, Italy Lombardy, Italy Tuscany, Sweden, UK Wales, USA Utah 1Czech Republic only provided data on syndromic cases
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Kaplan-Meier survival curves up to age five for isolated, multiple congenital anomalies (MCA) and syndromic omphalocele in six surveillance systems with available data, 2000-2012 2a Isolated Cases: Italy Lombardy, Italy Tuscany, Sweden, UK Wales, USA Utah 2b Omphalocele with Multiple Congenital Anomalies: Italy Lombardy, Italy Tuscany, Sweden, UK Wales, USA Utah 2c. Syndromic omphalocele: Czech Republic1, Italy Lombardy, Italy Tuscany, Sweden, UK Wales, USA Utah 1Czech Republic only provided data on syndromic cases

References

    1. Parker SE, Mai CT, Canfield MA, et al. Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004-2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2010;88(12):1008–1016. - PubMed
    1. Tan KH, Kilby MD, Whittle MJ, Beattie BR, Booth IW, Botting BJ. Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in England and Wales 1987-93: retrospective analysis of OPCS data. Bmj. 1996;313(7062):903–906. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hemminki K, Saloniemi I, Kyyronen P, Kekomaki M. Gastroschisis and omphalocele in Finland in the 1970s: prevalence at birth and its correlates. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1982;36(4):289–293. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bryon-Scott R, Haan E, Chan A, Bower C, Scott H, Clark K. A population-based study of abdominal wall defects in South Australia and Western Australia. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 1998;12:136–151. - PubMed
    1. Forrester MB, Merz RD. Epidemiology of abdominal wall defects, Hawaii, 1986-1997. Teratology. 1999;60(3):117–123. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources