Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Feb:130:13-22.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.10.007. Epub 2020 Oct 15.

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

Chantelle Garritty  1 , Gerald Gartlehner  2 , Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit  3 , Valerie J King  4 , Candyce Hamel  5 , Chris Kamel  6 , Lisa Affengruber  3 , Adrienne Stevens  7
Affiliations

Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviews

Chantelle Garritty et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Feb.

Abstract

Objectives: To develop methods guidance to support the conduct of rapid reviews (RRs) produced within Cochrane and beyond, in response to requests for timely evidence syntheses for decision-making purposes including urgent health issues of high priority.

Study design and setting: Interim recommendations were informed by a scoping review of the underlying evidence, primary methods studies conducted, and a survey sent to 119 representatives from 20 Cochrane entities, who were asked to rate and rank RR methods across stages of review conduct. Discussions among those with expertise in RR methods further informed the list of recommendations with accompanying rationales provided.

Results: Based on survey results from 63 respondents (53% response rate), 26 RR methods recommendations are presented for which there was a high or moderate level of agreement or scored highest in the absence of such agreement. Where possible, how recommendations align with Cochrane methods guidance for systematic reviews is highlighted.

Conclusion: The Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers new, interim guidance to support the conduct of RRs. Because best practice is limited by the lack of currently available evidence for some RR methods shortcuts taken, this guidance will need to be updated as additional abbreviated methods are evaluated.

Keywords: Decision-making; Evidence synthesis; Rapid review; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Suite of methodological research to inform the definition and methods for Cochrane rapid reviews.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ganann R., Ciliska D., Thomas H. Expediting systematic reviews: methods and implications of rapid reviews. Implement Sci. 2010;5:56. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khangura S., Konnyu K., Cushman R., Grimshaw J., Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Syst Rev. 2012;1:10. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bero L., Busuttil G., Farquhar C., Koehlmoos T.P., Moher D., Nylenna M. Measuring the performance of the Cochrane library. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12:ED000048. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tsafnat G., Glasziou P., Choong M.K., Dunn A., Galgani F., Coiera E. Systematic review automation technologies. Syst Rev. 2014;3:74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moher D., Stewart L., Shekelle P. All in the family: systematic reviews, rapid reviews, scoping reviews, realist reviews, and more. Syst Rev. 2015;4:183. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources