Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial
- PMID: 33069281
- PMCID: PMC7561304
- DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30831-8
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial
Abstract
Background: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic warrants accelerated efforts to test vaccine candidates. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine candidate, BBIBP-CorV, in humans.
Methods: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 trial at Shangqiu City Liangyuan District Center for Disease Control and Prevention in Henan Province, China. In phase 1, healthy people aged 18-80 years, who were negative for serum-specific IgM/IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 at the time of screening, were separated into two age groups (18-59 years and ≥60 years) and randomly assigned to receive vaccine or placebo in a two-dose schedule of 2 μg, 4 μg, or 8 μg on days 0 and 28. In phase 2, healthy adults (aged 18-59 years) were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) to receive vaccine or placebo on a single-dose schedule of 8 μg on day 0 or on a two-dose schedule of 4 μg on days 0 and 14, 0 and 21, or 0 and 28. Participants within each cohort were randomly assigned by stratified block randomisation (block size eight) and allocated (3:1) to receive vaccine or placebo. Group allocation was concealed from participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. The secondary outcome was immunogenicity, assessed as the neutralising antibody responses against infectious SARS-CoV-2. This study is registered with www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2000032459.
Findings: In phase 1, 192 participants were enrolled (mean age 53·7 years [SD 15·6]) and were randomly assigned to receive vaccine (2 μg [n=24], 4 μg [n=24], or 8 μg [n=24] for both age groups [18-59 years and ≥60 years]) or placebo (n=24). At least one adverse reaction was reported within the first 7 days of inoculation in 42 (29%) of 144 vaccine recipients. The most common systematic adverse reaction was fever (18-59 years, one [4%] in the 2 μg group, one [4%] in the 4 μg group, and two [8%] in the 8 μg group; ≥60 years, one [4%] in the 8 μg group). All adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity. No serious adverse event was reported within 28 days post vaccination. Neutralising antibody geometric mean titres were higher at day 42 in the group aged 18-59 years (87·7 [95% CI 64·9-118·6], 2 μg group; 211·2 [158·9-280·6], 4 μg group; and 228·7 [186·1-281·1], 8 μg group) and the group aged 60 years and older (80·7 [65·4-99·6], 2 μg group; 131·5 [108·2-159·7], 4 μg group; and 170·87 [133·0-219·5], 8 μg group) compared with the placebo group (2·0 [2·0-2·0]). In phase 2, 448 participants were enrolled (mean age 41·7 years [SD 9·9]) and were randomly assigned to receive the vaccine (8 μg on day 0 [n=84] or 4 μg on days 0 and 14 [n=84], days 0 and 21 [n=84], or days 0 and 28 [n=84]) or placebo on the same schedules (n=112). At least one adverse reaction within the first 7 days was reported in 76 (23%) of 336 vaccine recipients (33 [39%], 8 μg day 0; 18 [21%], 4 μg days 0 and 14; 15 [18%], 4 μg days 0 and 21; and ten [12%], 4 μg days 0 and 28). One placebo recipient in the 4 μg days 0 and 21 group reported grade 3 fever, but was self-limited and recovered. All other adverse reactions were mild or moderate in severity. The most common systematic adverse reaction was fever (one [1%], 8 μg day 0; one [1%], 4 μg days 0 and 14; three [4%], 4 μg days 0 and 21; two [2%], 4 μg days 0 and 28). The vaccine-elicited neutralising antibody titres on day 28 were significantly greater in the 4 μg days 0 and 14 (169·5, 95% CI 132·2-217·1), days 0 and 21 (282·7, 221·2-361·4), and days 0 and 28 (218·0, 181·8-261·3) schedules than the 8 μg day 0 schedule (14·7, 11·6-18·8; all p<0·001).
Interpretation: The inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV, is safe and well tolerated at all tested doses in two age groups. Humoral responses against SARS-CoV-2 were induced in all vaccine recipients on day 42. Two-dose immunisation with 4 μg vaccine on days 0 and 21 or days 0 and 28 achieved higher neutralising antibody titres than the single 8 μg dose or 4 μg dose on days 0 and 14.
Funding: National Program on Key Research Project of China, National Mega projects of China for Major Infectious Diseases, National Mega Projects of China for New Drug Creation, and Beijing Science and Technology Plan.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated COVID-19 vaccine, BBIBP-CorV, in people younger than 18 years: a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 1/2 trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Feb;22(2):196-208. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00462-X. Epub 2021 Sep 15. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 34536349 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):181-192. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30843-4. Epub 2020 Nov 17. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 33217362 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of an inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) in healthy children and adolescents: a double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 1/2 clinical trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;21(12):1645-1653. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00319-4. Epub 2021 Jun 28. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34197764 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine response in patients with cancer: An interim analysis.Eur J Cancer. 2021 Dec;159:259-274. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.10.013. Epub 2021 Oct 25. Eur J Cancer. 2021. PMID: 34798454 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 infection in humans: A systematic review.PLoS One. 2020 Dec 31;15(12):e0244126. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244126. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 33382764 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
A novel vaccine based on SARS-CoV-2 CD4+ and CD8+ T cell conserved epitopes from variants Alpha to Omicron.Sci Rep. 2022 Oct 6;12(1):16731. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21207-2. Sci Rep. 2022. PMID: 36202985 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity among chronic liver disease patients and liver transplant recipients: A meta-analysis.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022 Oct;28(4):890-911. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2022.0087. Epub 2022 Jun 3. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2022. PMID: 36263669 Free PMC article.
-
Poor immune response to coronavirus disease vaccines in decompensated cirrhosis patients and liver transplant recipients.Vaccine. 2022 Nov 15;40(48):6971-6978. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.042. Epub 2022 Oct 25. Vaccine. 2022. PMID: 36374707 Free PMC article.
-
A Comprehensive Review of the Global Efforts on COVID-19 Vaccine Development.ACS Cent Sci. 2021 Apr 28;7(4):512-533. doi: 10.1021/acscentsci.1c00120. Epub 2021 Mar 29. ACS Cent Sci. 2021. PMID: 34056083 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Time to Report the Side Effects after AstraZeneca and Sinopharm Vaccinations in Users of the COVID-19 Symptom Study App: A Survey in South Iran.Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023 Sep 12;37:99. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.37.99. eCollection 2023. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2023. PMID: 38021386 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous