Beyond the Core-Deficit Hypothesis in Developmental Disorders
- PMID: 33071483
- PMCID: PMC7539596
- DOI: 10.1177/0963721420925518
Beyond the Core-Deficit Hypothesis in Developmental Disorders
Abstract
Developmental disorders and childhood learning difficulties encompass complex constellations of relative strengths and weaknesses across multiple aspects of learning, cognition, and behavior. Historically, debate in developmental psychology has been focused largely on the existence and nature of core deficits-the shared mechanistic origin from which all observed profiles within a diagnostic category emerge. The pitfalls of this theoretical approach have been articulated multiple times, but reductionist, core-deficit accounts remain remarkably prevalent. They persist because developmental science still follows the methodological template that accompanies core-deficit theories-highly selective samples, case-control designs, and voxel-wise neuroimaging methods. Fully moving beyond "core-deficit" thinking will require more than identifying its theoretical flaws. It will require a wholesale rethink about the way we design, collect, and analyze developmental data.
Keywords: cognitive development; developmental disorders; developmental psychology; developmental science.
© The Author(s) 2020.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared that there were no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship or the publication of this article.
Figures

References
-
- Bathelt J., Holmes J., Astle D. E., on behalf of the Centre for Attention Learning and Memory (CALM) Team. (2018). Data-driven subtyping of executive function–related behavioral problems in children. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 57, 252–262. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.014 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources