Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 11:11:578000.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.578000. eCollection 2020.

The "Square Box": Therapeutic Equivalence as a Foundation of the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines

Affiliations

The "Square Box": Therapeutic Equivalence as a Foundation of the WHO Model List of Essential Medicines

Bernadette Cappello et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Every two years, the World Health Organization (WHO) updates its Model List of Essential Medicines, intended as a guide for countries to adopt or adapt in accordance with local priorities and treatment guidelines, for the development of national essential medicines lists. When more than one therapeutic option is available for a given indication, the WHO Model List often includes a single medicine as representative of a group of equivalent and interchangeable medicines. The representative medicine of that group is listed with an accompanying 'square box' symbol. The intended purpose of the square box is to highlight pharmacological classes or groups of medicines for which countries, institutions and health professionals can assume homogeneous therapeutic efficacy and safety and select the most appropriate single medicine based on price, local availability, and acceptability. Though this concept of therapeutic equivalence within a therapeutic class has been endorsed by most authoritative textbooks of pharmacology since Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics and evidence-based guidelines, marketing forces have often made claims on individual drugs to distinguish them beyond relevant differences shown by reliable evidence: this has generated the concept of "me-too drugs" with its double meaning-i.e., market latecomers differing minimally from products preceding them and whose marketing budgets have significant opportunity costs, or medicines which may be useful to substitute for equivalent products in the event of shortages. The square box concept is applied in the context of a comprehensive list: therapeutic equivalence or interchangeability cannot always be easily established. Different interpretations have been applied to different groups of medicines over the 40+ year history of the Model List. This paper presents the concept of the square box, provides key examples and guidance on how square box listings should be practically interpreted in the development and implementation of national essential medicine lists, considers the applicability of a square box listing concept to biologic medicines and proposes that an updated review of the square box concept and listings is warranted.

Keywords: WHO model list of essential medicines; biologic medicines; interchangeability; medicines selection; therapeutic equivalence.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Aronson J. K., Green A. R. (2020). Me-too pharmaceutical products: History, definitions, examples, and relevance to drug shortages and essential medicines lists. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 10.1111/bcp.14327 [Epub ahead of print] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbier L., Ebbers H., Declerck P., Simoens S., Vulto A. G., Huys I. (2020). The efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of switching between reference biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars: a systematic review. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 10.1002/cpt.1836 [Epub ahead of print] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. CADTH (2017). Switching from Innovator to Biosimilar (Subsequent Entry) Infliximab: An Updated Review of the Clinical Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness, and Guidelines (Ottawa ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; ). 18 January 2017. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK442045/ (Accessed March 27, 2020). - PubMed
    1. D’Amore C., Da Cas R., Rossi M., Traversa G. (2016). Switching Between Epoetins: A Practice in Support of Biosimilar Use. BioDrugs 30 (1), 27–32. 10.1007/s40259-015-0155-0 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ebbers H. C., Muenzberg M., Schellekens H. (2012). The safety of switching between therapeutic proteins. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 12 (11), 1473–1485. 10.1517/14712598.2012.711308 - DOI - PubMed