Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Sep 24:11:570567.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570567. eCollection 2020.

When Pandemic Hits: Exercise Frequency and Subjective Well-Being During COVID-19 Pandemic

Affiliations

When Pandemic Hits: Exercise Frequency and Subjective Well-Being During COVID-19 Pandemic

Ralf Brand et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

The governmental lockdowns related to the COVID-19 pandemic have forced people to change their behavior in many ways including changes in exercise. We used the brief window of global lockdown in the months of March/April/May 2020 as an opportunity to investigate the effects of externally imposed restrictions on exercise-related routines and related changes in subjective well-being. Statistical analyses are based on data from 13,696 respondents in 18 countries using a cross-sectional online survey. A mixed effects modeling approach was used to analyze data. We tested whether exercise frequency before and during the pandemic would influence mood during the pandemic. Additionally, we used the COVID-19 pandemic data to build a prediction model, while controlling for national differences, to estimate changes in exercise frequency during similar future lockdown conditions depending on prelockdown exercise frequency. According to the prediction model, those who rarely exercise before a lockdown tend to increase their exercise frequency during it, and those who are frequent exercisers before a lockdown tend to maintain it. With regards to subjective well-being, the data show that those who exercised almost every day during this pandemic had the best mood, regardless of whether or not they exercised prepandemic. Those who were inactive prepandemic and slightly increased their exercise frequency during the pandemic, reported no change in mood compared to those who remained inactive during the pandemic. Those who reduced their exercise frequency during the pandemic reported worse mood compared to those who maintained or increased their prepandemic exercise frequency. This study suggests that under similar lockdown conditions, about two thirds of those who never or rarely exercise before a lockdown might adopt an exercise behavior or increase their exercise frequency. However, such changes do not always immediately result in improvement in subjective well-being. These results may inform national policies, as well as health behavior and exercise psychology research on the importance of exercise promotion, and prediction of changes in exercise behavior during future pandemics.

Keywords: habit; health; mood; motivation; physical activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Changes in exercise behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic in March/April/May 2020 compared to prepandemic. Lighter colors show lower percentages.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Model predictions on the probabilities of exercising during similar lockdown conditions, depending on prelockdown exercise frequency. Lighter colors indicate smaller probabilities and darker colors indicate larger probabilities. If the darkest colors were all on the diagonal from bottom left to top right, this would mean that people who exercise at a specific frequency before a lockdown would be most likely to exercise at the same frequency during a lockdown.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
The effect of exercise frequency during the pandemic on mood depending on prepandemic exercise frequency. Lines indicate values for mood during the pandemic (higher values are better mood). Each column indicates exercise frequency before the pandemic, and exercise frequency levels within each column are exercise frequency levels during the pandemic.

References

    1. Antoniewicz A., Brand R. (2016). Learning to Like Exercising: Evaluative Conditioning Changes Automatic Evaluations of Exercising and Influences Subsequent Exercising Behavior. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 38 138–148. 10.1123/jsep.20152125 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bandura A. (1989). “Self-efficacy mechanism in physiological activation and health-promoting behavior,” in Adaptation, Learning and Affect, eds Madden J., Matthysse S., Barchas J. (Raven: ), 1169–1188.
    1. Bates D., Mächler M., Bolker B. M., Walker S. C. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using Lme4. J. Statist. Soft. 67 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Brand R., Ekkekakis P. (2018). Affective-Reflective Theory of Physical Inactivity and Exercise: Foundations and Preliminary Evidence. German J Exerc. Sport Res. 48 48–58. 10.1007/s12662-017-0477479 - DOI
    1. Breda J., Jakovljevic J., Rathmes G., Mendes R., Fontaine O., Hollmann S., et al. (2018). Promoting health-enhancing physical activity in europe: Current state of surveillance, policy development and implementation. Health Policy 122 519–527. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.01.015 - DOI - PMC - PubMed