Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2020 Sep 1:32:e30.
doi: 10.35371/aoem.2020.32.e30. eCollection 2020.

A work-relatedness assessment in epidemiological case investigation of occupational cancers: I. Principles

Affiliations
Review

A work-relatedness assessment in epidemiological case investigation of occupational cancers: I. Principles

Kihun Kim et al. Ann Occup Environ Med. .

Abstract

It is important to identify the causal relationship between occupational exposure and the disease in the area of compensation because most cancers have long latent period. This review presents the principles that should be considered when evaluating the work-relatedness. We reviewed reports on occupational cancers published by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists, National Toxicology Program, Environmental Protection Agency, European Union, which are the world's most prestigious organizations. In addition, we reviewed relevant papers and books published in Korea. The process is conducted in the order of cancer diagnosis, exposure assessment for carcinogens, and work-relatedness assessment. The probability of causation is determined stochastically rather than deterministically. There is no absolute standard for accreditation criteria and results may vary according to expert opinions and in each country or organization. Revealing the causal relationship of occupational cancers is a difficult process owing to inconsistency in relevant epidemiological studies, lack of well-established biological mechanisms, loss of objective occupational historical data, and other complexity of individual cases. Causation is unclear in many cases. Nevertheless, the data should be reviewed in detail for each case suspected of work-related cancers, and an assessment should be made through valid and plausible logic and literature evidences.

Keywords: Carcinogens; Causation; Occupational exposure; Work-relatedness assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Ward E. Overview of preventable industrial causes of occupational cancer. Environ Health Perspect. 1995;103 Suppl 8:197–203. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim EA. Evaluation of cancer risk for Korean workers through the establishment of the cohort study for special health check workers. Ulsan: Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency; 2018.
    1. Brown JR, Thornton JL. Percivall Pott (1714–1788) and chimney sweepers' cancer of the scrotum. Br J Ind Med. 1957;14(1):68–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Siemiatycki J, Richardson L, Straif K, Latreille B, Lakhani R, Campbell S, et al. Listing occupational carcinogens. Environ Health Perspect. 2004;112(15):1447–1459. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Doll R, Peto R. The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66(6):1191–1308. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources