Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2021 Mar;38(1):95-103.
doi: 10.1111/ger.12502. Epub 2020 Oct 18.

Oral care knowledge, attitude and practice: Caregivers' survey and observation

Najla Chebib  1 , Talina Clizia Waldburger  2 , Sandrine Boire  3 , Virginie Prendki  3 , Sabrina Maniewicz  1 , Mojon Philippe  1 , Frauke Müller  1   4
Affiliations

Oral care knowledge, attitude and practice: Caregivers' survey and observation

Najla Chebib et al. Gerodontology. 2021 Mar.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to assess caregivers' knowledge, perception and perceived barriers as well as their daily usual practice concerning oral care provision in a geriatric hospital.

Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire was developed and administered to caregivers in a geriatric ward. Furthermore, oral care delivery to dependent and independent patients was clinically observed.

Results: One hundred and fifty-two caregivers (60% nurses, 40% nursing aids) completed the survey (78% response rate). Clinical oral care was observed in 97 inpatients. Observations revealed that brushing was done in 94% of opportunities in independent patients but in only 55% of dependent patients. This corresponded to the frequency indicated in the questionnaire for independent elders (97%, n.s.), whereas it was significantly different for dependent elders (89%, P < .001). 95% of caregivers stated in the questionnaire never verifying self-administered oral care, whereas 12.3% were actually observed verifying intraorally its efficiency (P = .07 chi-squared test). 71% of the respondents stated storing the prostheses dry, and 8% stated that they reinserted it after cleaning. Caregivers' observation revealed that 35.1% of prostheses were reinserted in the mouth, indicating a significantly higher rate than in the questionnaire (P < .05). Respondents felt that their training to perform oral hygiene measures was suboptimal (VAS 48 ± 34.4). Patients verbally refusing oral care were stated as a barrier by 14% of respondents and were witnessed in 15.6% of observation opportunities (n.s).

Conclusion: Various measures, such as hospital health policy, improved logistics or advanced hands-on training, might help to converge the clinical practice towards the theoretical knowledge.

Keywords: caregivers; dependent elder; geriatric ward; hospitalised patients; oral care; oral hygiene.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Peltola P, Vehkalahti MM, Wuolijoki-Saaristo K. Oral health and treatment needs of the long-term hospitalised elderly. Gerodontology. 2004;21(2):93-99.
    1. Schimmel M, Leemann B, Schnider A, Herrmann FR, Kiliaridis S, Muller F. Changes in oro-facial function and hand-grip strength during a 2-year observation period after stroke. Clin Oral Invest. 2013;17(3):867-876.
    1. Kwok C, McIntyre A, Janzen S, Mays R, Teasell R. Oral care post stroke: a scoping review. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42(1):65-74.
    1. Scannapieco FA. Role of oral bacteria in respiratory infection. J Periodontol. 1999;70(7):793-802.
    1. Clave P, Shaker R. Dysphagia: current reality and scope of the problem. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;12(5):259-270.

LinkOut - more resources