Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Dec;10(12):e01877.
doi: 10.1002/brb3.1877. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

Number line estimation and standardized test performance: The left digit effect does not predict SAT math score

Affiliations

Number line estimation and standardized test performance: The left digit effect does not predict SAT math score

Katherine Williams et al. Brain Behav. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

Introduction: Recent work reveals a new source of error in number line estimation (NLE), the left digit effect (Lai, Zax, et al., 2018), whereby numerals with different leftmost digits but similar magnitudes (e.g., 399, 401) are placed farther apart on a number line (e.g., 0 to 1,000) than is warranted. The goals of the present study were to: (1) replicate the left digit effect, and (2) assess whether it is related to mathematical achievement.

Method: Participants were all individuals (adult college students) who completed the NLE task in the laboratory between 2014 and 2019 for whom SAT scores were available (n = 227).

Results: We replicated the left digit effect but found its size was not correlated with SAT math score, although it was negatively correlated with SAT verbal score for one NLE task version.

Conclusions: These findings provide further evidence that individual digits strongly influence estimation performance and suggest that this effect may have different cognitive contributors, and predict different complex skills, than overall NLE accuracy.

Keywords: left digit effect; number line estimation; numerical cognition; standardized achievement tests.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scatterplots of the relationship between SAT math and (a) hundreds difference score and (b) percent absolute error (across task versions)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scatterplots of the relationship between SAT verbal and hundreds difference score for the NLE task (a) speeded version and (b) self‐paced version

References

    1. Ashcraft, M. H. , & Moore, A. M. (2012). Cognitive processes of numerical estimation in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 111(2), 246–267. 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.08.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bailey, D. H. , Siegler, R. S. , & Geary, D. C. (2014). Early predictors of middle school fraction knowledge. Developmental Science, 17(5), 775–785. 10.1111/desc.12155 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barth, H. C. , & Paladino, A. M. (2011). The development of numerical estimation: Evidence against a representational shift. Developmental Science, 14(1), 125–135. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.00962.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barth, H. , Slusser, E. , Cohen, D. , & Paladino, A. (2011). A sense of proportion: Commentary on Opfer, Siegler and Young. Developmental Science, 14(5), 1205–1206. 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01081.x - DOI - PubMed
    1. Beracha, E. , & Seiler, M. J. (2015). The effect of pricing strategy on home selection and transaction prices: An investigation of the left‐most digit effect. Journal of Housing Research, 24(2), 147–161. 10.1080/10835547.2015.12092101 - DOI

Publication types