Repurposing of drugs for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 33073552
- DOI: 10.23736/S0031-0808.20.04024-0
Repurposing of drugs for COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the data currently available regarding the repurposing of different drugs for COVID-19 treatment. Participants with suspected or diagnosed COVID-19 were included in this study. The interventions that have been considered were repurposed drugs and comparators that included standard of care treatment or placebo.
Evidence acquisition: We searched Ovid-MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library, clinical trial registration site in the UK(NIHR), Europe (clinicaltrialsregister.eu), US (ClinicalTrials.gov) and internationally (isrctn.com), and reviewed the reference lists of articles for eligible articles published up to April 22, 2020. All studies in English that evaluated the efficacy of the listed drugs were included. Cochrane RoB 2.0 and ROBINS-I tool were used to assess study quality. This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol is available at PROSPERO (CRD42020180915).
Evidence synthesis: From 708 identified studies or clinical trials, 16 studies and 16 case reports met our eligibility criteria. Of these, 6 were randomized controlled trials (763 patients), 7 cohort studies (321 patients) and 3 case series (191 patients). Chloroquine (CQ) had a 100% discharge rate compared to 50% with lopinavir-ritonavir at day 14, however a trial has recommended against a high dosage due to cardiotoxic events. Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) has shown no significant improvement in negative seroconversion rate which is also seen in our meta-analysis (P=0.68). Adverse events with HCQ have a significant difference compared to the control group (P=0.001). Lopinavir-ritonavir has shown no improvement in time to clinical improvement which is seen in our meta-analyses (P=0.1). Remdesivir has shown no significant improvement in time to clinical improvement but this trial had insufficient power.
Conclusions: Due to the paucity in evidence, it is difficult to establish the efficacy of these drugs in the treatment of COVID-19 as currently there is no significant clinical effectiveness of the repurposed drugs. Further large clinical trials are required to achieve more reliable findings. A risk-benefit analysis is required on an individual basis to weigh out the potential improvement in clinical outcome and viral load reduction compared to the risks of the adverse events.
Similar articles
-
Effectiveness of Interferon Beta 1a, compared to Interferon Beta 1b and the usual therapeutic regimen to treat adults with moderate to severe COVID-19: structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Jun 3;21(1):473. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04382-3. Trials. 2020. PMID: 32493468 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of antiviral combination therapy in symptomatic patients of Covid-19 infection - a randomised controlled trial (SEV-COVID Trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials. 2020 Oct 20;21(1):866. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04774-5. Trials. 2020. PMID: 33081849 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
[The praise of uncertainty: a systematic living review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug treatments for patients with covid-19.].Recenti Prog Med. 2021 Mar;112(3):195-206. doi: 10.1701/3565.35458. Recenti Prog Med. 2021. PMID: 33687358 Italian.
-
Agreement of treatment effects from observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir, or dexamethasone for covid-19: meta-epidemiological study.BMJ. 2022 May 10;377:e069400. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-069400. BMJ. 2022. PMID: 35537738 Free PMC article.
-
Adverse effects of remdesivir, hydroxychloroquine and lopinavir/ritonavir when used for COVID-19: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials.BMJ Open. 2022 Mar 2;12(3):e048502. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048502. BMJ Open. 2022. PMID: 35236729 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacological Interventions for Covid-19: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2021 May 3;12:649472. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.649472. eCollection 2021. Front Pharmacol. 2021. PMID: 34012398 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Inflammatory pathways in patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: The role of the clinical immunologist.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Nov;133(5):507-515. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.021. Epub 2024 Aug 22. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024. PMID: 39179099 Review.
-
COVID-19 Pandemic- Ethical Challenges for Healthcare Workers Practicing in Resource-Limited Settings.Niger Med J. 2022 Sep 16;63(1):1-9. doi: 10.60787/NMJ-63-1-116. eCollection 2022 Jan-Feb. Niger Med J. 2022. PMID: 38798972 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Association of Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir Treatment on Upper Respiratory Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (SARS-Cov-2 RT-PCR) Negative Conversion Rates Among High-Risk Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Clin Infect Dis. 2023 Feb 8;76(3):e148-e154. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac600. Clin Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 35870128 Free PMC article.
-
Journey from an Enabler to a Strategic Leader: Integration of the Medical Affairs Function in ESG Initiatives and Values.Pharmaceut Med. 2023 Nov;37(6):405-416. doi: 10.1007/s40290-023-00485-9. Epub 2023 Jul 18. Pharmaceut Med. 2023. PMID: 37464231 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous