Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2020 Dec;11(1):1394-1401.
doi: 10.1080/21505594.2020.1831342.

Reliability of induced sputum test is greater than that of throat swab test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A multi-center cross-sectional study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Reliability of induced sputum test is greater than that of throat swab test for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19: A multi-center cross-sectional study

Tianwen Lai et al. Virulence. 2020 Dec.

Abstract

We previously reported that sputum induction was more sensitive than throat swabs for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in two convalescent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients; however, the value and safety of induced sputum testing require further study. We conducted a prospective multi-center cross-sectional study to compare induced sputum to throat swabs for SARS-CoV-2 detection. Confirmed COVID-19 patients from six hospitals in six cities across China who received one or more negative RT-PCR result for SARS-CoV-2 were enrolled, and paired specimens (induced sputum and throat swabs; 56 cases) were assayed. In three paired samples, both the induced sputum and throat swabs were positive for SARS-CoV-2. The positive rate for induced sputum was significantly higher than for throat swabs both overall (28.6% vs 5.4%, respectively; p < 0.01). Patients were divided according to time span from onset of illness to sample collection into the more-than-30-day (n = 26) and less-than-30-day (n = 30) groups. The positive rate for induced sputum was also significantly higher than for throat swabs in the less-than-30-day group (53.3% vs 10.0%, respectively; p < 0.001). For the more-than-30-day group, all paired samples were negative for SARS-CoV-2. Blood oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and heart rate remained stable during sputum induction and no staff were infected. Because induced sputum is more reliable and has a lower false-negative rate than throat swabs, we believe induced sputum is more useful for the confirmation of COVID-19 and is safer as a criterion for release from quarantine.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; induced sputum; reliability; throat swab.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Distribution of RT-PCR results for throat swab and induced sputum specimens in patients with COVID-19.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Changes in patients’ vital signs during induced sputum collection.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO . Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) situation reports. 2020. [cited 2020 September23]. Available from: https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situatio...
    1. National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China . Diagnosis and treatment of pneumonia infected with novel coronavirus. 2020. March 3 [cited 2020 August5]. Available from: http://www.nhc.gov.cn/yzygj/s7653p/202003/46c9294a7dfe4cef80dc7f5912eb19... (in Chinese)
    1. Yuan J, Kou S, Liang Y, et al. PCR assays turned positive in 25 discharged COVID-19 patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2020. published online Apr 8. DOI:10.1093/cid/ciaa398 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lan L, Xu D, Ye G, et al. Positive RT-PCR test results in patients recovered from COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;323:1502. published online Feb 27. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Woloshin S, Patel N, Kesselheim AS.. False negative tests for SARS-COV-2 infection - challenges and implications. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:e38. Epub ahead of print June 5. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms