The effect of shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on health-related quality of life in 10-20 mm renal stones: a prospective randomized pilot study
- PMID: 33074423
- DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01219-1
The effect of shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on health-related quality of life in 10-20 mm renal stones: a prospective randomized pilot study
Abstract
The effects of treatment modalities such as retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were determined in patients with renal stones between 10 and 20 mm. A total of 120 patients were included in the study and prospectively randomized to RIRS or SWL group. A total of 39 patients experienced treatment failure and finally 81 patients (45 patients in the RIRS group, 36 patients in the SWL group) were analyzed for HRQoL. SF-36 survey was used to determine HRQoL pre-operatively, post-operative day 1 and 1 month. The patient and stone characteristics such as age, gender, stone size, grade of hydronephrosis and body mass index were similar between the two groups. At post-operative day 1, the RIRS group was associated with lower scores of role functioning/physical (p = 0.008), role functioning/emotional (p = 0.047) energy/fatigue (p = 0.011), social functioning (p = 0.003) and pain (p = 0.003) when compared to the SWL group. At post-operative 1 month, only pain and emotional well-being scores (p = 0.012 and p = 0.011, respectively) in the RIRS group were statistically lower according to the SWL group. In our study, patients in the SWL group showed more favorable HRQoL scores when compared to the patients in the RIRS group in short-term follow-up.
Keywords: ESWL; Quality of life; RIRS; Renal stones; SF-36.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment: The effect of shock wave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery on health-related quality of life in 10-20 mm renal stones: a prospective randomized pilot study.Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jan-Feb;48(1):186-187. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2022.01.07. Int Braz J Urol. 2022. PMID: 34735091 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Chewcharat A, Curhan G (2020) Trends in the prevalence of kidney stones in the United States from 2007 to 2016. Urolithiasis Sep 1. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-020-01210-w . Online ahead of print.
-
- Liu Y, Chen Y, Liao B et al (2018) Epidemiology of urolithiasis in Asia. Asian J Urol 5(4):205–214 - DOI
-
- Turk C, Petrik A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482 - DOI
-
- Raja A, Wood F, Joshi HB (2020) The impact of urinary stone disease and their treatment on patients’ quality of life: a qualitative study. Urolithiasis 48(3):227–234 - DOI
-
- Sahin C, Tuncer M, Yazıcı O et al (2014) Do the residual fragments after shock wave lithotripsy affect the quality of life? Urology 84(3):549–554 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
