Hospital Costs Following Surgical Complications: A Value-driven Outcomes Analysis of Cost Savings Due to Complication Prevention
- PMID: 33074874
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004243
Hospital Costs Following Surgical Complications: A Value-driven Outcomes Analysis of Cost Savings Due to Complication Prevention
Abstract
Objective: Surgical complications have substantial impact on healthcare costs. We propose an analysis of the financial impact of postoperative complications.
Summary of background data: Both complications and preoperative patient risk have been shown to increase costs following surgery. The extent of cost increase due to specific complications has not been well described.
Methods: A single institution's American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data was queried from 2012 to 2018 and merged with institutional cost data for each encounter. A mixed effects multivariable generalized linear model was used to estimate the mean relative increase in hospital cost due to each complication, adjusting for patient and procedure-level fixed effects clustered by procedure. Potential savings were calculated based on projected decreases in complication rates and theoretical hospital volume.
Results: There were 11,897 patients linked between the 2 databases. The rate of any American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program complication was 11.7%. The occurrence of any complication resulted in a 1.5-fold mean increase in direct hospital cost [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.49-1.58]. The top 6 most costly complications were postoperative septic shock (4.0-fold, 95% CI 3.58-4.43) renal insufficiency/failure (3.3-fold, 95% CI 2.91-3.65), any respiratory complication (3.1-fold, 95% CI 2.94-3.36), cardiac arrest (3.0-fold, 95% CI 2.64-3.46), myocardial infarction (2.9-fold, 95% CI 2.43-3.42) and mortality within 30 days (2.2-fold, 95% CI 2.01-2.48). Length of stay (6.5 versus 3.2 days, P < 0.01), readmission rate (29.1% vs 3.1%, P < 0.01), and discharge destination outside of home (20.5% vs 2.7%, P < 0.01) were significantly higher in the population who experienced complications.
Conclusions: Decreasing complication rates through preoperative optimization will improve patient outcomes and lead to substantial cost savings.
Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Vonlanthen R, Slankamenac K, Breitenstein S, et al. The impact of complications on costs of major surgical procedures: a cost analysis of 1200 patients. Ann Surg 2011; 254:907–913.
-
- Liu JB, Berian JR, Chen S, et al. Postoperative complications and hospital payment: implications for achieving value. J Am Coll Surg 2017; 224:779–786.e2.
-
- Hartman M, Martin AB, Espinosa N, et al. National health care spending in 2016: Spending and enrollment growth slow after initial coverage expansions. Health Aff (Project Hope) 2018; 37:150–160.
-
- Porter ME. What is value in health care? New Engl J Med 2010; 363:2477–2481.
-
- Porter ME. A strategy for health care reform--toward a value-based system. N Engl J Med 2009; 361:109–112.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
