Comment on "Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy"
- PMID: 33074879
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004289
Comment on "Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy"
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Comment in
-
Response to the Comment on "Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy".Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e734. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004278. Ann Surg. 2021. PMID: 33278167 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
Outcomes After Minimally-invasive Versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study.Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):356-363. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002850. Ann Surg. 2020. PMID: 29864089
References
-
- Klompmaker S, van Hilst J, Wellner UF, et al. Outcomes after minimally-invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy: a Pan-European propensity score matched study. Ann Surg 2020; 271:356–363.
-
- Chen P, Wang Y, Fang X, et al. Prognostic significance of peritumoral fibrosis after resection of pancreatic head cancer. Oncol Lett 2020; 19:1235–1240.
-
- Xie T, Wang X, Li M, et al. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a radiomics nomogram outperforms clinical model and TNM staging for survival estimation after curative resection. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:2513–2524.
-
- Shi Y, Wang W, Qiu W, et al. Learning curve from 450 cases of robot-assisted pancreaticoduocectomy in a high-volume pancreatic center: optimization of operative procedure and a retrospective study. Ann Surg 2019.
-
- Song KB, Kim SC, Lee W, et al. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary tumors: lessons learned from 500 consecutive patients in a single center. Surg Endosc 2020; 34:1343–1352.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
