Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 15;17(20):7495.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207495.

Important Difference between Occupational Hazard Exposure among Shift Workers and Other Workers; Comparing Workplace before and after 1980

Affiliations

Important Difference between Occupational Hazard Exposure among Shift Workers and Other Workers; Comparing Workplace before and after 1980

Maud Miguet et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Improving health and safety at work has been an important issue for the European Union since the 1980s. The existing literature supports that shift work is associated with multiple indicators of poor health but frequently neglects the potential impact of occupational hazards. This study aims at describing and comparing the exposure to different workplace hazards among shift and other workers before and after 1980. Exposure to different workplace hazards (noise, dust, pollutant, and other physical stressors) were analyzed among 119,413 participants from the UK Biobank cohort. After stratifying the analyses before and after 1980, exposure was compared between shift and other workers. Potential confounding variables (sex, age, ethnicity, education level, occupational category, and neuroticism) were adjusted for in the log-binomial regression. Shift workers had a higher prevalence ratio (PR) than other workers of being exposed to almost all identified hazards both before or after 1980. They were also more likely to be exposed to multiple hazards compared to other workers, both before 1980 (PR: 1.25; 95% CI: 1.21-1.30) and after 1980 (PR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.30-1.38). The prevalence of all measured risk factors was higher after 1980 than before 1980 among shift workers. Of note, the work environment has improved overall for other workers. Our findings suggest that changes at the workplace have benefited other workers more than shift workers as they are still more exposed to all occupational hazards.

Keywords: epidemiology; hazardous substances; occupational health; pollutant; shift work; work environment; world disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent of shift workers among job categories before and after 1980. ***: p-value < 0.001.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Prevalence ratio of occupational risk exposure among shift workers compared with other workers. (A) Prevalence for shift workers compared to other workers (reference) before 1980; (B) Prevalence for shift workers compared to other workers (reference) after 1980. Analysis controlled for sex, ethnicity, education level, age, and occupational category.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Prevalence ratio of occupational risk exposure, exposure after 1980 compared with before 1980. (A) Prevalence for shift workers after 1980, compared to shift workers before 1980 (reference); (B) Prevalence for other workers after 1980, compared to other workers before 1980 (reference). Analysis controlled for sex, ethnicity, education level, and age.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Number of workplace hazards comparing shift and other workers.

References

    1. Obelenis V., Malinauskiene V. The influence of occupational environment and professional factors on the risk of cardiovascular disease. Medicina. 2007;43:96. doi: 10.3390/medicina43020011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kim K.-W., Won Y.L., Ko K.S., Heo K.-H., Chung Y.H. The Effects of Hazardous Chemical Exposure on Cardiovascular Disease in Chemical Products Manufacturing Workers. Toxicol. Res. 2012;28:269–277. doi: 10.5487/TR.2012.28.4.269. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rizi H.A.Y., Hasanzadeh A. Noise exposure as a risk factor of cardiovascular diseases in workers. J. Educ. Heal. Promot. 2013;2:14. doi: 10.4103/2277-9531.112683. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stave G.M., Wald P.H. Physical and Biological Hazards of the Workplace. John Wiley & Sons; Hoboken, NJ, USA: 2016.
    1. Skogstad M., Johannessen H.A., Tynes T., Mehlum I.S., Nordby K.-C., Lie A. Systematic review of the cardiovascular effects of occupational noise. Occup. Med. 2016;66:10–16. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqv148. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types