Comparison of the Impact of Pharmacogenetic Variability on the PK of Slow Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations
- PMID: 33076474
- PMCID: PMC7602647
- DOI: 10.3390/genes11101205
Comparison of the Impact of Pharmacogenetic Variability on the PK of Slow Release and Immediate Release Tacrolimus Formulations
Abstract
Tacrolimus-modified release formulations allow for once-daily dosing, and adherence is better compared to the twice-daily immediate release formulation. When patients are switched from one formulation to another, variable changes in drug concentrations are observed. Current data suggest that the changes in drug exposure are larger in patients who express the CYP3A5 enzyme (CYP3A5 *1/*3 or *1/*1) compared to nonexpressers (CYP3A5*3/*3). Possibly, these differences are due to the fact that in the upper region of the small intestine CYP3A activity is higher, and that this expression of CYP3A decreases towards the more distal parts of the gut. Modified release formulations may therefore be subject to a less presystemic metabolism. However, the full implications of pharmacogenetic variants affecting the expression and function of drug transporters in the gut wall and of enzymes involved in phase I and phase II metabolism on the different formulations are incompletely understood, and additional studies are required. Conclusions: In all patients in whom the formulation of tacrolimus is changed, drug levels need to be checked to avoid clinically relevant under- or overexposure. In patients with the CYP3A5 expresser genotype, this recommendation is even more important, as changes in drug exposure can be expected.
Keywords: CYP3A; immediate release; modified release; pharmacogenetics; pharmacokinetics; switching; tacrolimus; therapeutic drug monitoring; transplantation.
Conflict of interest statement
In the last three years, T.v.G. has received lecture fees and study grants from Chiesi and Astellas, in addition to consulting fees from Roche Diagnostics, Vitaeris, Astellas, Aurinia Pharma and Novartis. In all cases, money has been transferred to hospital accounts, and none has been paid to his personal bank accounts. T.v.G. does not have employment or stock ownership at any of these companies, and neither does he have patents or patent applications. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Tang J., Andrews L.M., Van Gelder T., Shi Y., Van Schaik R., Wang L., Hesselink D. Pharmacogenetic aspects of the use of tacrolimus in renal transplantation: Recent developments and ethnic considerations. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2016;12:555–565. doi: 10.1517/17425255.2016.1170808. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Birdwell K.A., Decker B., Barbarino J.M., Peterson J.F., Stein C.M., Sadee W., Wang D., Vinks A.A., He Y., Swen J.J., et al. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines forCYP3A5Genotype and Tacrolimus Dosing. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2015;98:19–24. doi: 10.1002/cpt.113. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Andrews L.M., Hesselink D.A., Van Schaik R.H.N., Van Gelder T., De Fijter J.W., Lloberas N., Elens L., Moes D.J.A.R., De Winter B.C.M. A population pharmacokinetic model to predict the individual starting dose of tacrolimus in adult renal transplant recipients. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019;85:601–615. doi: 10.1111/bcp.13838. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
