Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2020 Oct 19;20(1):271.
doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01290-9.

Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Comparative Study

Design of a randomized controlled trial to evaluate effectiveness of methotrexate versus prednisone as first-line treatment for pulmonary sarcoidosis: the PREDMETH study

Vivienne Kahlmann et al. BMC Pulm Med. .

Abstract

Background: Treatment of pulmonary sarcoidosis is recommended in case of significant symptoms, impaired or deteriorating lung function. Evidence-based treatment recommendations are limited and largely based on expert opinion. Prednisone is currently the first-choice therapy and leads to short-term improvement of lung function. Unfortunately, prednisone often has side-effects and may be associated with impaired quality of life. Methotrexate is presently considered second-line therapy, and appears to have fewer side-effects.

Objective: The primary objective of this trial is to investigate the effectiveness and tolerability of methotrexate as first-line therapy in patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis compared with prednisone. The primary endpoint of this study will be the change in hospital-measured Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) between baseline and 24 weeks. Secondary objectives are to gain more insights in response to therapy in individual patients by home spirometry and patient-reported outcomes. Blood biomarkers will be examined to find predictors of response to therapy, disease progression and chronicity, and to improve our understanding of the underlying disease mechanism.

Methods/design: In this prospective, randomized, non-blinded, multi-center, non-inferiority trial, we plan to randomize 138 treatment-naïve patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis who are about to start treatment. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either prednisone or methotrexate in a predefined schedule for 24 weeks, after which they will be followed up in regular care for up to 2 years. Regular hospital visits will include pulmonary function assessment, completion of patient-reported outcomes, and blood withdrawal. Additionally, patients will be asked to perform weekly home spirometry, and record symptoms and side-effects via a home monitoring application for 24 weeks.

Discussion: This study will be the first randomized controlled trial comparing first-line treatment of prednisone and methotrexate and provide valuable data on efficacy, safety, quality of life and biomarkers. If this study confirms the hypothesis that methotrexate is as effective as prednisone as first-line treatment for sarcoidosis but with fewer side-effects, this will lead to improvement in care and initiate a change in practice. Furthermore, insights into the immunological mechanisms underlying sarcoidosis pathology might reveal new therapeutic targets.

Trial registration: The study was registered on the 19th of March 2020 in the International Clinical Trial Registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov; ID NCT04314193 .

Keywords: Biomarkers; Home monitoring; Methotrexate; Prednisone; Quality of life; Sarcoidosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no competing interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart of the treatment schedule for methotrexate and prednisone during the randomisation phase
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Example of Home spirometry outcome, this graphical overview is available on patient’s personal platform and is accessible for both patients and the study team

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gerke AK, Judson MA, Cozier YC, Culver DA, Koth LL. Disease Burden and Variability in Sarcoidosis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(Supplement_6):S421–S4S8. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201707-564OT. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Drent M, Strookappe B, Hoitsma E, De Vries J. Consequences of Sarcoidosis. Clin Chest Med. 2015;36(4):727–737. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.08.013. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wijsenbeek MS, Culver DA. Treatment of Sarcoidosis. Clin Chest Med. 2015;36(4):751–767. doi: 10.1016/j.ccm.2015.08.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Paramothayan NS, Lasserson TJ, Jones PW. Corticosteroids for pulmonary sarcoidosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):Art. No.: CD001114. 10.1002/14651858.CD001114.pub2. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Costabel U, Hunninghake GW. ATS/ERS/WASOG statement on sarcoidosis. Sarcoidosis statement committee. American Thoracic Society. European Respiratory Society. World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(4):735–737. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-3003.1999.14d02.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data