Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 19;18(1):344.
doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01595-7.

The validity of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) in Hungarian patients with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations

The validity of the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ) in Hungarian patients with type 2 diabetes

Agnes Vincze et al. Health Qual Life Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: A wide range of measuring instruments are available for diabetes self-management. According to several studies, a relatively new instrument, the diabetes self-management questionnaire (DSMQ), shows a consistent relationship with outcomes of diabetes treatment as well, such as glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Furthermore, the questionnaire is short, but covers the main aspects of diabetes management. Given the increasing prevalence of diabetes in Hungary, our goal was to adapt this user-friendly questionnaire and analyze its validity.

Methods: After the standard translation process, we analyzed a sample of 221 people. The construct validity of the questionnaire was tested with HbA1c and body mass index. Morisky Medication Adherence Scale-8 values were tested via Pearson correlations. Known-groups validity of the DSMQ in relation to groups based on glycemic control levels was investigated using one-way ANOVA.

Results: The "sum scale" of the questionnaire and the HbA1c values show an inverse relationship (r = - 0.253, p < 0.01). Body mass index was related to the "sum scale" (r = - 0.214, p < 0.01) and to the "physical activity" (r = - 0.219, p < 0.01), while questionnaire results reflecting medication adherence correlated with the "glucose management" (r = - 0.291, p < 0.01), "health-care use" subscale (r = 0.236, p < 0.01) and the "sum scale" (r = 0.281, p < 0.01). A significant difference (F = 6.225, p = 0.002) was found between the DSMQ mean scores of the three groups, defined by good, medium, and poor glycemic control levels.

Conclusions: The Hungarian version of the DSMQ was considered a valid tool for the measurement of diabetes self-management. With its help, problematic areas of self-management could be uncovered, and interventions can be improved.

Keywords: DSMQ; HbA1c; Self-management; Type 2 diabetes mellitus; Validity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Differences in the relationship between indicators and indices vs. constructs and scales [14] (page 2084)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sample structure for the Hungarian version of the Diabetes Self-Management Questionnaire (DSMQ) validation

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ogurtsova K, da Rocha Fernandes JD, Huang Y, Linnenkamp U, Guariguata L, Cho NH, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;128:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC. Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004;291(3):335–342. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.3.335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arnold LW, Wang Z. The HbA1c and all-cause mortality relationship in patients with type 2 diabetes is J-shaped: a meta-analysis of observational studies. The review of diabetic studies. RDS. 2014;11(2):138–152. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domjan BA, Ferencz V, Tanczer T, Szili-Janicsek Z, Barkai L, Hidvegi T, et al. Large increase in the prevalence of self-reported diabetes based on a nationally representative survey in Hungary. Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(2):107–111. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2016.09.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lu Y, Xu J, Zhao W, Han HR. Measuring self-care in persons with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2016;39(2):131–184. doi: 10.1177/0163278715588927. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances