Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 19;9(1):242.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01494-4.

Environmental assessment of cytotoxic drugs in healthcare settings: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laila Al Alawi  1 , Elpidoforos S Soteriades  1   2 , Marilia Silva Paulo  1   3 , Linda Östlundh  4 , Michal Grivna  1 , Fatima Al Maskari  1   5 , Rami H Al-Rifai  6   7
Affiliations

Environmental assessment of cytotoxic drugs in healthcare settings: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laila Al Alawi et al. Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Occupational exposure to cytotoxic drugs is associated with various unfavorable health outcomes. This protocol reports a methodology for a systematic review and meta-analysis that aims to systematically review the published literature and quantify the level of environmental contamination of healthcare settings with cytotoxic drugs.

Methods: This protocol is developed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol-2015 (PRISMA-P) guidelines. Six electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and EMBASE) will be searched with no restrictions on publication period. Eligible studies will be identified and data will be extracted using a predefined data extraction form by at least two independent reviewers following best practice. Eligible studies should report calculated or calculable estimates on the proportion of positive samples tested for cytotoxic drugs and/or estimates on the concentration of the cytotoxic drug(s) in the tested samples. Risk of bias (RoB) will be assessed by using the RoB in Studies estimating Prevalence of Exposure to Occupational risk factors (RoB-SPEO) tool, which developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) and International Labour Organization (ILO) for environmental and occupational health systematic reviews. The random-effects model will be used to perform meta-analyses.

Discussion: Occupational exposure to cytotoxic drugs is associated with short- and long-term adverse health outcomes. Following this protocol, the review to be carried out will be the first to fill an evidence gap on the environmental contamination of healthcare settings with cytotoxic drugs. The findings of this review will help in the understanding of the risk of occupational exposure of healthcare workers to cytotoxic drugs and facilitate the identification of priority areas for specific interventions.

Ethics and dissemination: The systematic review methodology does not require ethics approval due to the nature of the study design. The results of the systematic review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be publicly available.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42020162780 , dated July 14, 2020.

Keywords: Cytotoxic drugs; Environmental assessment; Meta-analysis; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2016) NIOSH Workplace Safety and Health Topic: NIOSH list of antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in healthcare settings. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2016-161/default.html . Accessed 13 Aug 2020.
    1. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (2019). Reproductive health and the workplace. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/repro/antineoplastic.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2020.
    1. European Biosafety Network. 2020. Preventing occupational exposure to cytotoxic drugs. Available at https://www.europeanbiosafetynetwork.eu/preventing-occupational-exposure.... Accessed 24 Aug. 2020.
    1. Lawson CC, Rocheleau CM, Whelan EA, Lividoti Hibert EN, Grajewski B, Spiegelman D, et al. Occupational exposures among nurses and risk of spontaneous abortion. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206(4):327 e1–327 e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.12.030. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connor TH, Lawson CC, Polovich M, McDiarmid MA. Reproductive health risks associated with occupational exposures to antineoplastic drugs in health care settings: a review of the evidence. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(9):901–910. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000000249. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances