Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers
- PMID: 33077239
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.002
Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers
Abstract
Objective: To study the true prevalence of recurrent implantation failure.
Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Setting: A private assisted reproductive technology center.
Patient(s): Women (n = 4,429) with anatomically normal uterus who underwent up to three consecutive frozen euploid single embryo transfers (FE-SETs) were included in the study. Cycles with donor eggs or gestational carriers were excluded.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): Cumulative outcomes from these cycles were analyzed. A logistic regression model was used to assess the differences of outcomes between first, second, and third FE-SET and a Kaplan-Meier curve as used to analyze cumulative implantation rate.
Result(s): The mean age of the patients included in the study was of 35.4 years. The sustained implantation rates of the first, second, and third FE-SET were 69.9%, 59.8%, and 60.3% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative sustained implantation rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 95.2%. The live birth rates after the first, second, and third FE-SET were 64.8%, 54.4%, and 54.1% per transfer, respectively. The cumulative live birth rate after up to three consecutive FE-SET was 92.6%. The miscarriage rate after observing a positive heartbeat was not different between the first (7.2%), second (8.8%), and third (12.7%) FE-SET.
Conclusion(s): Our findings suggest that true recurrent implantation failure is rare. For those patients with the ability to make euploid blastocysts, <5% would fail to achieve a clinical pregnancy with three embryos transferred. It remains to be further investigated whether this threshold identifies a truly recalcitrant group or simply a statistical certainty based on random variation.
Keywords: Recurrent implantation failure; euploid blastocysts; frozen embryo transfer; preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy.
Copyright © 2020 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Evaluating recurrent implantation failure in the setting of euploid elective single-embryo transfer: Is three really the magic number?Fertil Steril. 2021 Jan;115(1):70-71. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.154. Epub 2020 Dec 4. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 33272637 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.Hum Reprod. 2019 Sep 29;34(9):1632-1639. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dez138. Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31402381
-
Does recurrent implantation failure exist? Prevalence and outcomes of five consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers in 123 987 patients.Hum Reprod. 2024 May 2;39(5):974-980. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deae040. Hum Reprod. 2024. PMID: 38452358
-
The reproductive potential of vitrified-warmed euploid embryos declines following repeated uterine transfers.Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024 Feb 13;22(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12958-024-01192-z. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2024. PMID: 38350949 Free PMC article.
-
Recurrent implantation failure: how common is it?Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Jun 1;33(3):207-212. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000698. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2021. PMID: 33896917 Review.
-
Management strategies following implantation failure of euploid embryos.Reprod Med Biol. 2024 Apr 8;23(1):e12576. doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12576. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec. Reprod Med Biol. 2024. PMID: 38590944 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Implantation Failures and Miscarriages in Frozen Embryo Transfers Timed in Hormone Replacement Cycles (HRT): A Narrative Review.Life (Basel). 2021 Dec 7;11(12):1357. doi: 10.3390/life11121357. Life (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34947887 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Endometrial receptivity testing for assisted reproductive technologies.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD016209. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016209. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 40600370 Free PMC article.
-
Defining recurrent implantation failure: a profusion of confusion or simply an illusion?Fertil Steril. 2021 Dec;116(6):1432-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.10.023. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 34836579 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Transcriptomic landscape of cumulus cells from patients <38 years old with a history of poor ovarian response (POR) treated with platelet-rich plasma (PRP).Aging (Albany NY). 2025 Feb 18;17(2):431-447. doi: 10.18632/aging.206202. Epub 2025 Feb 18. Aging (Albany NY). 2025. PMID: 39976580 Free PMC article.
-
Endometrial Metabolism of 17β-Estradiol during the Window of Implantation in Women with Recurrent Implantation Failure.Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025 May 16:1-12. doi: 10.1159/000546442. Online ahead of print. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2025. PMID: 40373756 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources