Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Nov 26;70(701):e890-e898.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X713393. Print 2020 Dec.

Excess mortality in the first COVID pandemic peak: cross-sectional analyses of the impact of age, sex, ethnicity, household size, and long-term conditions in people of known SARS-CoV-2 status in England

Affiliations

Excess mortality in the first COVID pandemic peak: cross-sectional analyses of the impact of age, sex, ethnicity, household size, and long-term conditions in people of known SARS-CoV-2 status in England

Mark Joy et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has passed its first peak in Europe.

Aim: To describe the mortality in England and its association with SARS-CoV-2 status and other demographic and risk factors.

Design and setting: Cross-sectional analyses of people with known SARS-CoV-2 status in the Oxford RCGP Research and Surveillance Centre (RSC) sentinel network.

Method: Pseudonymised, coded clinical data were uploaded from volunteer general practice members of this nationally representative network (n = 4 413 734). All-cause mortality was compared with national rates for 2019, using a relative survival model, reporting relative hazard ratios (RHR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A multivariable adjusted odds ratios (OR) analysis was conducted for those with known SARS-CoV-2 status (n = 56 628, 1.3%) including multiple imputation and inverse probability analysis, and a complete cases sensitivity analysis.

Results: Mortality peaked in week 16. People living in households of ≥9 had a fivefold increase in relative mortality (RHR = 5.1, 95% CI = 4.87 to 5.31, P<0.0001). The ORs of mortality were 8.9 (95% CI = 6.7 to 11.8, P<0.0001) and 9.7 (95% CI = 7.1 to 13.2, P<0.0001) for virologically and clinically diagnosed cases respectively, using people with negative tests as reference. The adjusted mortality for the virologically confirmed group was 18.1% (95% CI = 17.6 to 18.7). Male sex, population density, black ethnicity (compared to white), and people with long-term conditions, including learning disability (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.22 to 3.18, P = 0.0056) had higher odds of mortality.

Conclusion: The first SARS-CoV-2 peak in England has been associated with excess mortality. Planning for subsequent peaks needs to better manage risk in males, those of black ethnicity, older people, people with learning disabilities, and people who live in multi-occupancy dwellings.

Keywords: medical record systems, computerized; mortality; pandemics; sentinel surveillance; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Mortality per 100 000 across ISO Weeks 2–20 of 2019 and 2020 from sentinel network (RCGP RSC) and ONS ISO = International Standards Organization. ONS = Office of National Statistics. RCGP RSC = Oxford Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre network. For tabulated mortality rates see Supplementary Table S4.

References

    1. Oksanen A, Kaakinen M, Latikka R, et al. Regulation and trust: 3-month follow-up study on COVID-19 mortality in 25 European countries. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020;6(2):e19218. - PMC - PubMed
    1. EuroMOMO Graphs and maps. 2020 www.euromomo.eu/graphs-and-maps/ (accessed 13 Oct 2020).
    1. Scally G, Jacobson B, Abbasi K. The UK’s public health response to covid-19. BMJ. 2020;369:m1932. - PubMed
    1. Gordon AL, Goodman C, Achterberg W, et al. Commentary: COVID in care homes-challenges and dilemmas in healthcare delivery. Age Ageing. 2020;49(5):701–705. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marmot M. Society and the slow burn of inequality. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1413–1414. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types