Into a new decade

Affiliations

¹ Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. marc.brysbaert@ugent.be.
² Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
³ Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
⁴ University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
⁵ Goethe University Frankfurt & University of Oslo, Frankfurt, Germany.
⁶ University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
⁷ McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
⁸ University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
⁹ University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
¹⁰ University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
¹¹ Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
¹² National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Editorial

Marc Brysbaert et al. Behav Res Methods. 2021 Feb.

. 2021 Feb;53(1):1-3.

doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01497-y. Epub 2020 Oct 19.

¹ Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, B-9000, Ghent, Belgium. marc.brysbaert@ugent.be.
² Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands.
³ Harrisburg University of Science and Technology, Harrisburg, PA, USA.
⁴ University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
⁵ Goethe University Frankfurt & University of Oslo, Frankfurt, Germany.
⁶ University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
⁷ McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
⁸ University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
⁹ University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.
¹⁰ University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
¹¹ Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN, USA.
¹² National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

Erratum in

Correction to: Editorial: Into a new decade.
Brysbaert M, Bakk Z, Buchanan EM, Drieghe D, Frey A, Kim E, Kuperman V, Madan CR, Marelli M, Mathôt S, Valdivia DS, Yap M. Brysbaert M, et al. Behav Res Methods. 2022 Apr;54(2):1050. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01506-0. Behav Res Methods. 2022. PMID: 35169989 No abstract available.

No abstract available

Keywords: Editorial; Editorial decision; Open science; Reliability; Validity.

1. Ackerman, P. L., & Hambrick, D. Z. (2020). A primer on assessing intelligence in laboratory studies. Intelligence, 80, 101440. - DOI
1. Hedge, C., Powell, G., & Sumner, P. (2018). The reliability paradox: Why robust cognitive tasks do not produce reliable individual differences. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1166–1186. - DOI
1. Quintana, D. S. (2020). A synthetic dataset primer for the biobehavioural sciences to promote reproducibility and hypothesis-generation. eLIFE,9: e53275. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.53275 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
1. Vanpaemel, W., Vermorgen, M., Deriemaecker, L., & Storms, G. (2015). Are we wasting a good crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the Storm. Collabra, 1(1), Art. 3. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.13
1. Vines, T. H., Albert, A. Y., Andrew, R. L., Débarre, F., Bock, D. G., Franklin, M. T., … Rennison, D. J. (2014). The availability of research data declines rapidly with article age. Current biology, 24(1), 94–97. - DOI