Focal nonmotor versus motor seizures: The impact on diagnostic delay in focal epilepsy
- PMID: 33078409
- DOI: 10.1111/epi.16707
Focal nonmotor versus motor seizures: The impact on diagnostic delay in focal epilepsy
Abstract
Objective: To test the hypothesis that people with focal epilepsy experience diagnostic delays that may be associated with preventable morbidity, particularly when seizures have only nonmotor symptoms, we compared time to diagnosis, injuries, and motor vehicle accidents (MVAs) in people with focal nonmotor versus focal seizures with motor involvement at epilepsy onset.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the enrollment data from the Human Epilepsy Project, which enrolled participants between 2012 and 2017 across 34 sites in the USA, Canada, Europe, and Australia, within 4 months of treatment for focal epilepsy. A total of 447 participants were grouped by initial seizure semiology (focal nonmotor or focal with motor involvement) to compare time to diagnosis and prediagnostic injuries including MVAs.
Results: Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. There were 246 participants (55%) with nonmotor seizures and 201 participants (45%) with motor seizures at epilepsy onset. Median time to diagnosis from first seizure was 10 times longer in patients with nonmotor seizures compared to motor seizures at onset (P < .001). The number and severity of injuries were similar between groups. However, 82.6% of MVAs occurred in patients with undiagnosed nonmotor seizures.
Significance: This study identifies reasons for delayed diagnosis and consequences of delay in patients with new onset focal epilepsy, highlighting a treatment gap that is particularly significant in patients who experience nonmotor seizures at epilepsy onset.
Keywords: clinical neurology; complex partial seizures; epilepsy semiology; epilepsy/seizures; partial seizures.
© 2020 International League Against Epilepsy.
Comment in
-
Closing the Diagnostic Gap in Epilepsy: Recognizing More Than Just Motor Seizures.Epilepsy Curr. 2021 Feb 16;21(3):173-174. doi: 10.1177/1535759721994807. eCollection 2021 May-Jun. Epilepsy Curr. 2021. PMID: 34867097 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Firkin AL, Marco DJT, Saya S, Newton MR, O’Brien TJ, Berkovic SF, et al. Mind the gap: multiple events and lengthy delays before presentation with a “first seizure”. Epilepsia. 2015;56(10):1534-41.
-
- Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377-81.
-
- Saleem MN, Arencibia CA, McKenna K, Cristofaro S, Detyniecki K, Friedman D, et al. Investigation of patient and observer agreement on description of seizures at initial clinical visit. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2019;6(12):2601-6.
-
- Fisher RS, Cross JH, D’Souza C, French JA, Haut SR, Higurashi N, et al. Instruction manual for the ILAE 2017 operational classification of seizure types. Epilepsia. 2017;58(4):531-42.
-
- Ngugi AK, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR. Estimation of the burden of active and life-time epilepsy: a meta-analytic approach. Epilepsia. 2010;51(5):883-90.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous