Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 20;15(10):e0240816.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240816. eCollection 2020.

Determinants of long acting reversible contraception utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based case control study

Affiliations

Determinants of long acting reversible contraception utilization in Northwest Ethiopia: An institution-based case control study

Kiros Terefe Gashaye et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Though long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) are highly effective, have minimal side effects, require minimal follow-up, and are low cost, only 10% of contraceptives used in Ethiopia are LARCs. The reason for this low uptake is not understood at the country or regional level. Therefore, this study identified determinants of LARC utilization in Northwest Ethiopia.

Methods: A facility-based unmatched case control study, using LARC users as cases and short- acting reversible contraception (SARC) users as controls, had been conducted at fourteen public health institutions in Northwest Ethiopia. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select participants with a 1:2 case to control ratio (n = 1167). Binary logistic regression analysis was used to identify determinants of LARC utilization among family planning service users.

Results: Wealth status [AOR:1.87, 95%CI (1.08, 3.24)], history of abortion [AOR:2.69, 95%CI (1.41, 5.12)], limiting family size [AOR: 2.38, 95%CI (1.01, 5.62)], good knowledge about LARCs [AOR: 2.52, 95%CI (1.17, 5.41)], method convenience [AOR: 0.23, 95%CI (0.16, 0.34)], good availability of method [AOR:0.10 (0.05, 0.19)], less frequent visits to health facility [AOR:2.95, 95% CI(1.89, 4.62)], health care providers advice [AOR:10.69, 95%CI (3.27, 34.87)], partner approval [AOR:0.66, 95%CI (0.45, 0.97)], and favorable attitude towards LARCs [AOR:13.0, 95%CI (8.60, 19.72)] were significantly associated with LARC utilization.

Conclusion: Professional support, favorable attitude towards LARC use, high economic status, history of abortion, advantage of less frequent visits, having good knowledge towards LARC and interest of limiting births were significantly associated with LARC Utilization. On the other hand, perceived method convenience, and contraception availability were inversely associated with it. Family planning education about the benefits of LARC should be done by health providers and media. Male involvement in the counselling and decision making about the advantage of using LARC may improve the negative influence of partners on LARC utilization. It is also recommended that, future qualitative research further explore perceptions of LARC use.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. History of previous contraceptive methods used by SARC and LARC user women (N = 1124) in Amhara regional state, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Current contraceptive methods used by women in the Amhara regional state, Northwest Ethiopia, 2016.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. S.Berek, J., Berek and Novak’s Gynecology. 2012. - PubMed
    1. Tsegaye Tegenu, P.D., Exponential Population Growth and Carrying Capacity of the Ethiopian Economy. July 7, 2013.
    1. bongaarts, j., et al., Family Planning Programs for the 21st Century Rationale and design. 2012.
    1. World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Center for Communication Programs Knowledge for Health Project, and United States Agency for International Development (USAID) Bureau for Global Health Office of Population and Reproductive Health, Family Planning A GLOBAL HANDBOOK FOR PROVIDERS Evidence-based guidance developed through worldwide collaboration. 2011.
    1. Bailey M.J., Malkova O., and Norling J., Do Family Planning Programs Decrease Poverty? Evidence from Public Census Data. CESifo Econ Stud, 2014. 60(2): p. 312–337. 10.1093/cesifo/ifu011 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances