Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 16;10(10):1898.
doi: 10.3390/ani10101898.

Welfare Benefits of Intradermal Vaccination of Piglets

Déborah Temple  1 , Marta Jiménez  2 , Damián Escribano  3 , Gerard Martín-Valls  1 , Ivan Díaz  4 , Xavier Manteca  1
Affiliations

Welfare Benefits of Intradermal Vaccination of Piglets

Déborah Temple et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Vaccination is reported as a stressful and painful event for animals. This study investigated whether needle-free intradermal vaccination improves the welfare of weaned pigs through the reduction of stress and pain biomarkers and improvement of behavioural parameters compared to traditional intramuscular injection with a needle. A total of 339 weaned piglets were allocated to 3 treatment groups: Intradermal Application of Liquids (IDAL) pigs, vaccinated against Porcine Circovirus type 2 (PCV2) by means of intradermal vaccination using a needle-free device Porcilis® PCV ID; Intramuscular (IM) pigs vaccinated against PCV2 with Porcilis® PCV intramuscularly with a needle; CONTROL pigs were managed identically but did not receive any vaccine injection. At the time of the injection, the reaction of IDAL piglets was similar to control piglets, whereas a greater percentage of piglets vaccinated intramuscularly displayed high-pitch vocalizations (7% CONTROL, 7% IDAL, 32% IM) and retreat attempts (3% CONTROL, 7% IDAL, 39% IM). The day after vaccination, IDAL piglets did not differ from the control piglets for any of the behavioural variables studied through scan samplings. IM piglets showed a lower frequency of social negative interactions (p = 0.001) and rope manipulation (p = 0.04) compared to the CONTROL group. Resting postures did not differ between treatments. At 28 h post-vaccination, IDAL piglets presented lower blood C-reactive protein levels (CONTROL = 20 μg/mL; IDAL = 39 μg/mL; IM = 83 μg/mL, p < 0.0001) and blood Haptoglobin (CONTROL = 1.8 mg/mL; IDAL = 1.9 mg/mL vs. IM = 3.1 mg/mL, p < 0.0001) compared to IM piglets. Salivary chromogranin A and alpha-amylase did not differ between treatment groups when measured 25 min post-vaccination. The method of vaccination did not affect the growth of the piglets or their rectal temperature. These results support that needle-free intradermal vaccination reduces vaccination-related pain in growing pigs.

Keywords: behaviour; intradermal vaccination; pig; stress; welfare.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

M.J. is an employee of MSD Animal Health.

References

    1. Turner P.V., Brabb T., Pekow C., Vasbinder M.A. Administration of Substances to Laboratory Animals: Routes of Administration and Factors to Consider. J. Am. Assoc. Lab. Anim. Sci. 2011;50:600–613. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Leslie E., Hernández-Jover M., Newman R., Holyoake P. Assessment of acute pain experienced by piglets from ear tagging, ear notching and intraperitoneal injectable transponders. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010;127:86–95. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2010.09.006. - DOI
    1. Bangert C., Brunner P.M., Stingl G. Immune functions of the skin. Clin. Dermatol. 2011;29:360–376. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.01.006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sarno M.J., Blase E., Galindo N., Ramirez R., Schirmer C.L., Trujillo-Juarez D.F. Clinical immunogenicity of measles, mumps and rubella vaccine delivered by the Injex jet injector: Comparison with standard syringe injection. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. J. 2000;19:839–842. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200009000-00006. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Stout R.R., Gutierrez M.J., Roffman M., Marcos J., Sanchez R., Macias M., Quiroz R., Taylor D., Mckenzie B., Restrepo E., et al. Subcutaneous injections with a single-use, pre-filled, disposable needle-free injection device or needle and syringe: Comparative evaluation of efficacy and acceptability. Drug Deliv. Tech. 2004;4:2–6.