Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2020 Oct 20;10(10):e038861.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038861.

Natalizumab versus fingolimod for patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from REVEAL, a prospective, randomised head-to-head study

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Natalizumab versus fingolimod for patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from REVEAL, a prospective, randomised head-to-head study

Helmut Butzkueven et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To directly compare the efficacy of natalizumab and fingolimod in patients with active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Methods: This phase 4, randomised, rater- and sponsor-blinded, prospective, parallel-group, clinic-based head-to-head study was conducted at 43 sites in nine countries. Patients were randomised (1:1) to intravenous natalizumab 300 mg every 4 weeks or oral fingolimod 0.5 mg once daily for ≤52 weeks. Enrolment-related early study termination precluded assessment of the primary endpoint (evolution of new on-treatment gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions to persistent black holes). Unplanned exploratory analyses of secondary endpoints evaluated the effects of treatment on the development of new T1 Gd+ lesions and new/newly enlarging T2 lesions, lesion volumes and relapse outcomes.

Results: The intent-to-treat population comprised 108 patients (natalizumab, n=54; fingolimod, n=54); 63 completed ≥24 weeks of treatment. Due to the limited numbers of events and patients at risk, MRI and relapse outcomes were reported over up to 24 and 36 weeks, respectively. The mean number of new T1 Gd+ lesions was numerically lower with natalizumab than with fingolimod by 4 weeks; accumulation rates were 0.02 and 0.09 per week, respectively, over 24 weeks (p=0.004). The cumulative probability of developing ≥1 lesion at 24 weeks was 40.7% with natalizumab versus 58.0% with fingolimod (HR=0.60; 95% CI 0.31-1.16; p=0.126); the corresponding probabilities for ≥2 lesions were 11.5% vs 48.5% (HR=0.25; 95% CI 0.09-0.68; p=0.007). No significant between-group differences were observed for the other MRI outcomes at 24 weeks. The cumulative probability of relapse over follow-up was 1.9% with natalizumab versus 22.3% with fingolimod (HR=0.08; 95% CI 0.01-0.64; p=0.017). Adverse events were consistent with known safety profiles.

Conclusions: These results suggest that natalizumab is more efficacious than fingolimod in reducing multiple sclerosis relapses and T1 Gd+ lesion accumulation in patients with active disease.

Trial registration numbers: NCT02342704; EUCTR2013-004622-29-IT; Post-results.

Keywords: clinical trials; multiple sclerosis; neurology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: HB has received compensation for consulting from Biogen, Merck Serono and Novartis and research support from Biogen and Merck Serono. SL and NC are employees of and may hold stock and/or stock options in Biogen. DJ has received research funding from Biogen and Genentech and personal compensation for speaking or consulting services from Acorda, Bayer, Biogen, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Questcor, Serono and Teva. DLA has served on advisory boards for, received speaker honoraria from, served as a consultant for or received research support from Bayer, Biogen, Coronado Biosciences, the Consortium of Multiple Sclerosis Centers, Eli Lilly, EMD Serono, Genentech, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Serono, MS Forum, NeuroRx Research, Novartis, Opexa Therapeutics, Roche, Teva, the Canadian Institutes of Health Research, the Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada and the SA Serono Symposia International Foundation, and he holds stock in NeuroRx Research. MF is editor-in-chief of the Journal of Neurology; has received compensation for consulting services and/or speaking activities from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva; and has received research support from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Teva, the Italian Ministry of Health, la Fondazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla (FISM) and la Fondazione Italiana di Ricerca per la Sclerosi Laterale Amiotrofica (AriSLA). JG serves on the editorial boards of Multiple Sclerosis Journal and Neurology; has received speaker honoraria from Biogen, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis and Teva; has received research support from Biogen; and has served on the boards of the Dutch MS Research Foundation and the Progressive MS Alliance. SS and P-RH were employees of Biogen at the time of these analyses and may hold stock and/or stock options in Biogen.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean cumulative number of new Gd+ lesions on T1-weighted MRI scans reported over 24 weeks. *Reduction is for natalizumab versus fingolimod. P value is based on a negative binomial regression model adjusted for baseline T1 Gd+ lesion count. Gd+, gadolinium enhancing; SEM, standard error of the mean.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Impact of natalizumab versus fingolimod treatment on relapse outcomes, shown as (A) Kaplan-Meier survival curve of time to relapse over 52 weeks and (B) ARRs before study and on study. *Natalizumab versus fingolimod, based on a Cox model adjusted for number of relapses in the year before baseline, age, baseline EDSS score and years since the first symptom. The x-axis has been truncated at week 36, as no events were observed after week 36. P value is based on a negative binomial model of ARR with treatment as effect, adjusted for number of relapses in the year before baseline, years since the first symptom, baseline EDSS score and baseline age. ARR, annualised relapse rate; EDSS, Expanded Disability Status Scale.

References

    1. Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E, et al. . A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 2006;354:899–910. 10.1056/NEJMoa044397 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kappos L, Radue E-W, O’Connor P, et al. . A placebo-controlled trial of oral fingolimod in relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med Overseas Ed 2010;362:387–401. 10.1056/NEJMoa0909494 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calabresi PA, Radue E-W, Goodin D, et al. . Safety and efficacy of fingolimod in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (freedoms II): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Neurol 2014;13:545–56. 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70049-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radue E-W, O’Connor P, Polman CH, et al. . Impact of fingolimod therapy on magnetic resonance imaging outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Neurol 2012;69:1259–69. 10.1001/archneurol.2012.1051 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller DH, Soon D, Fernando KT, et al. . MRI outcomes in a placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab in relapsing MS. Neurology 2007;68:1390–401. 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260064.77700.fd - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data