Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 20;10(1):17733.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74841-z.

Toxic oligomers of the amyloidogenic HypF-N protein form pores in mitochondrial membranes

Affiliations

Toxic oligomers of the amyloidogenic HypF-N protein form pores in mitochondrial membranes

Maria Ylenia Farrugia et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Studies on the amyloidogenic N-terminal domain of the E. coli HypF protein (HypF-N) have contributed significantly to a detailed understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms in neurodegenerative diseases characterised by the formation of misfolded oligomers, by proteins such as amyloid-β, α-synuclein and tau. Given that both cell membranes and mitochondria are increasingly recognised as key targets of oligomer toxicity, we investigated the damaging effects of aggregates of HypF-N on mitochondrial membranes. Essentially, we found that HypF-N oligomers characterised by high surface hydrophobicity (type A) were able to trigger a robust permeabilisation of mito-mimetic liposomes possessing cardiolipin-rich membranes and dysfunction of isolated mitochondria, as demonstrated by a combination of mitochondrial shrinking, lowering of mitochondrial membrane potential and cytochrome c release. Furthermore, using single-channel electrophysiology recordings we obtained evidence that the type A aggregates induced currents reflecting formation of ion-conducting pores in mito-mimetic planar phospholipid bilayers, with multi-level conductances ranging in the hundreds of pS at negative membrane voltages. Conversely, HypF-N oligomers with low surface hydrophobicity (type B) could not permeabilise or porate mitochondrial membranes. These results suggest an inherent toxicity of membrane-active aggregates of amyloid-forming proteins to mitochondria, and that targeting of oligomer-mitochondrial membrane interactions might therefore afford protection against such damage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Permeabilisation kinetics and leakage of LUVs having mito-mimetic (IM-type) and neuronal-like (C-type) membranes induced by HypF-N protein in different aggregation states. (a–d) Time dependence of fluorescence of OG entrapped in C-type (C-Lipo) or IM-type (IM-Lipo) lipid vesicles following addition of 2 μM HypF-N oligomers (type A or type B) at a peptide-to-lipid molar ratio of 1:25. Control liposomes without peptide were incubated in liposome buffer containing equivalent concentrations of condition A or condition B aggregation buffer. Error bars represent the s.e.m. of 3 replicate experiments. (e) Comparison of OG dye leakage from C-lipo and IM-lipo by different HypF-N species. Leakage by monomeric (native), oligomeric (type A or type B oligo) and protofibrillar HypF-N are shown as a percentage of that induced by the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin (iono). Data are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3–7); ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, between marked pairs; ### p < 0.001, between type A and type B oligomers (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Leakage of FITC-dextran polymer (40 kDa and 250 kDA) from liposomes by HypF-N type A oligomers. Maximum leakage of FITC-40 and FITC-250 dextran molecules from 50 μM IM-type liposomes was determined after the addition of 2 μM type A HypF-N oligomeric aggregates, and is shown as a percentage of that induced by the detergent M-PER. Also shown is the background leakage from the liposomes incubated with an equivalent concentration of condition A aggregation buffer alone, to control for the effect of buffer. Data are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 5); *** p < 0.0001 (two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effects of HypF-N species on organelle volume, cytochrome c release and Δψm of isolated mitochondria. (a) Changes in the absorbance at 540 nm (A540 nm) in a suspension of freshly isolated mitochondria in MB after 60 min incubation, alone (Ctrl) or with the swelling-inducing agents 50 μM alamethicin and 250 μM CaCl2 (Ca2+), and with 10 μM HypF-N in monomeric (native) and oligomeric (type A, type B) states. Condition A buffer alone (used to generate the type A oligomers) was also included as a control. Significant swelling of mitochondria is triggered by alamethicin and Ca2+, as expected, whilst type A oligomers cause organelle shrinkage. (b) Representative kinetic traces (n = 3–5) showing the absorbance measurements (A540 nm), relative to the value at time 0 min, every 5 min for mitochondria incubated alone (Ctrl) or with 250 μM CaCl2 (Ca2+ ions), condition A buffer, and 10 µM HypF-N type A oligomers. The shrinkage effect of the type A aggregates is immediate and maintained over 60 min. (c) Effect of HypF-N species on the cyto c release (CCR) from isolated mitochondria incubated in MB for 60 min, given as a percentage of 1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (TX-100). Amount of cyto c released into buffer was determined using Quantikine immunoassay (~ 35 ng/ml with TX-100). A significant CCR was evoked by type A, but not type B or native HypF-N, at the same concentrations (12 μM). (d) Measurement of Δψm by JC-1 dye, from isolated mitochondria following 30-min exposure to equimolar concentrations (2 μM) of HypF-N (native, type A and type B oligomers). Δψm is given as a percentage of untreated mitochondria control (100%), after baseline correction obtained by dissipating Δψm using FCCP. A reduction in the Δψm is observed in the case of type A oligomers. In all panels data are presented as means ± s.e.m. (n = 3–6, with duplicate or triplicate measurements); * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, with respect to Ctrl or native HypF-N, or between marked pairs (one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni’s correction).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Electrophysiological characterisation of type A HypF-N pores in IM-type planar lipid bilayer. (a) Success rate of pore formation for each HypF-N species type, as a percentage of the total number of electrophysiology trials (n = 10 for 5 μM native HypF-N, and n = 15, 12 and 10 for 0.8 μM, 1.6 μM and 5 μM HypF-N type A oligomers, respectively). (b) Control trace devoid of channel activity, when native HypF-N or condition A aggregation buffer were added to the cis-chamber. (c–f) Representative current traces after addition of 5 µM oligomeric type A HypF-N. Typical current recordings are shown for type-I (c,d) and type-II (e,f) pores, at square wave-voltage pulses of − 40 mV and + 40 mV. The induced currents are indicative of the formation of HypF-N nanopores in the BLM. Electrical recordings were all carried out on IM-type planar BLM (45 PC/25 PE/10 PI/5 PS/15 CL) under symmetrical buffer conditions (250/250 mM KCl, 10 mM MOPS/Tris, pH 7.2), using PatchMaster standard protocols.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Current–voltage (I–V) relationships for a single HypF-N pore. Current–voltage ramp was performed under symmetric (250/250 mM KCl) and asymmetric (250/20 mM KCl) buffer conditions (10 mM MOPS/Tris, pH 7.2, 22 °C) whilst a type A HypF-N pore was inserted in the IM-type bilayer membrane. The intercept on the V axis equivalent to the reversal potential (Erev) is given at + 15 mV, implying a selectivity for cations. The I–V data set is fitted to a second order polynomial (quadratic) equation using a least squares fit (n = 2 independent experiments).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Histograms of conductance levels by HypF-N type A oligomers recorded in IM-type bilayers. (A) Histogram analysis of all the closed and multi-level open conductance states at + 40 mV (n = 3349) and − 40 mV (n = 3349) applied holding potential from a single-channel recording of a detected pore incorporated in IM-type planar BLM. Conductance histograms are fitted to a Gaussian distribution (solid black lines) with assigned peaks indicated by arrows. Peak conductance levels differ from each other by ~ 400–450 pS, indicating quantisation of conductivity with a smallest step of ~ 400–450 pS. Electrical recordings were carried out in 10 mM MOPS/Tris and 250/250 mM KCl, pH 7.2 at 22 °C.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Dwell-times for HypF-N type A oligomers at defined conductance states Open 1 to 3. Scatter plot of dwell-times recorded at conductance states Open 1, 2 and 3, at + 40 mV (left panel) and − 40 mV (right panel). The mean dwell-time (in ms) and its s.e.m. is also shown for each Open level. At a negative membrane potential, the open probability of Open 2 and Open 3 states is markedly increased.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chiti F, Dobson CM. Protein misfolding, amyloid formation, and human disease: A summary of progress over the last decade. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2017;86:27–68. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-061516-045115. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Soto C, Estrada LD. Protein misfolding and neurodegeneration. Arch. Neurol. 2008;65:184–189. doi: 10.1001/archneurol.2007.56. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kayed R, Lasagna-Reeves CA. Molecular mechanisms of amyloid oligomers toxicity. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(Suppl 1):S67–78. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-129001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gadad BS, Britton GB, Rao KS. Targeting oligomers in neurodegenerative disorders: Lessons from alpha-synuclein, tau, and amyloid-beta peptide. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2011;24(Suppl 2):223–232. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2011-110182. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bemporad F, Chiti F. Protein misfolded oligomers: Experimental approaches, mechanism of formation, and structure-toxicity relationships. Chem. Biol. 2012;19:315–327. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.02.003. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms