Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 2:6:49.
doi: 10.1038/s41523-020-00192-7. eCollection 2020.

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients

Affiliations

Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging use and oncologic outcomes in premenopausal breast cancer patients

Zexian Zeng et al. NPJ Breast Cancer. .

Abstract

Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) delineates disease extent sensitively in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients, but improved cancer outcomes are uncertain. Young women, for whom mammography is less sensitive, are expected to benefit from MRI-based resection. We identified 512 women aged ≤50 years, undergoing breast-conserving treatment (BCT: tumor-free resection margins and radiotherapy) during 2006-2013 through Northwestern Medicine database queries; 64.5% received preoperative MRI and 35.5% did not. Tumor and treatment parameters were similar between groups. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for local and distant recurrences (LR and DR), using multivariable regression models, accounting for important therapeutic and prognostic parameters. LR rate with MRI use was 7.9 vs. 8.2% without MRI, aHR = 1.03 (95% CI 0.53-1.99). DR rate was 6.4 vs. 6.6%, aHR = 0.89 (95% CI 0.43-1.84). In 119 women aged ≤40, results were similar to LR aHR = 1.82 (95% CI 0.43-7.76) and DR aHR = 0.93 (95% CI 0.26-3.34). Sensitivity analyses showed similar results. The use of preoperative MRI in women aged ≤50 years should be reconsidered until there is proof of benefit.

Keywords: Breast cancer; Outcomes research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Kaplan–Meier local and distant recurrence-free survival curves for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus no MRI.
a Entire cohort. b Sensitivity analysis excluding women with follow-up time <3 years. c Sensitivity analysis excluding women with Ductal carcinoma in situ. P-values were calculated using log-rank test.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brennan M, Spillane A, Houssami N. The role of breast MRI in clinical practice. Aust. Fam. Physician. 2009;38:513–519. - PubMed
    1. Houssami N, Hayes DF. Review of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in breast cancer: should MRI be performed on all women with newly diagnosed, early stage breast cancer? CA Cancer J. Clin. 2009;59:290–302. - PubMed
    1. Morrow M. Should routine breast cancer staging include MRI? Nat. Clin. Pr. Oncol. 2009;6:72–73. - PubMed
    1. Houssami N, et al. Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:3248–3258. - PubMed
    1. Jatoi I, Benson JR. The case against routine preoperative breast MRI. Future Oncol. 2013;9:347–353. - PubMed