Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2020 Oct 9;5(1):e000579.
doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000579. eCollection 2020.

Predictors for diabetic retinopathy progression-findings from nominal group technique and Evidence review

Affiliations

Predictors for diabetic retinopathy progression-findings from nominal group technique and Evidence review

Sajjad Haider et al. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. .

Abstract

Objectives: Risk stratification is needed for patients referred to hospital eye services by Diabetic Eye Screening Programme UK. This requires a set of candidate predictors. The literature contains a large number of predictors. The objective of this research was to arrive at a small set of clinically important predictors for the outcome of the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR). They need to be evidence based and readily available during the clinical consultation.

Methods and analysis: Initial list of predictors was obtained from a systematic review of prediction models. We sought the clinical expert opinion using a formal qualitative study design. A series of nominal group technique meetings to shorten the list and to rank the predictors for importance by voting were held with National Health Service hospital-based clinicians involved in caring for patients with DR in the UK. We then evaluated the evidence base for the selected predictors by critically appraising the evidence.

Results: The source list was presented at nominal group meetings (n=4), attended by 44 clinicians. Twenty-five predictors from the original list were ranked as important predictors and eight new predictors were proposed. Two additional predictors were retained after evidence check. Of these 35, 21 had robust supporting evidence in the literature condensed into a set of 19 predictors by categorising DR.

Conclusion: We identified a set of 19 clinically meaningful predictors of DR progression that can help stratify higher-risk patients referred to hospital eye services and should be considered in the development of an individual risk stratification model.

Study design: A qualitative study and evidence review.

Setting: Secondary eye care centres in North East, Midlands and South of England.

Keywords: public health; retina.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
List of candidate predictors from systematic review model development studies. Pie chart illustrates the percentage proportion of each category of predictors. Boxes indicate the type of candidate predictors in each category along with the number of modelling studies that considered them. Information on the full list of candidate predictors is given in online supplemental appendix A3. *The predictor was used in at least one model development. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; HDL, High Density Lipoproteins; LDL, Low Density Lipoproteins; WBC, White Blood Cells; BDR, Background Diabetic Retinopathy; NPDR, Non Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy; PDR, Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Summary of the sequence involved in reaching the final list of candidate predictors in table 3. NGT, nominal group technique.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fong DS, Aiello L, Gardner TW, et al. . Retinopathy in diabetes. Diabetes Care 2004;27(Suppl 1):S84–7. 10.2337/diacare.27.2007.S84 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhou B, Lu Y, Hajifathalian K, et al. . Worldwide trends in diabetes since 1980: a pooled analysis of 751 population-based studies with 4.4 million participants. Lancet 2016;387:1513–30. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00618-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mathur R, Bhaskaran K, Edwards E, et al. . Population trends in the 10-year incidence and prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the UK: a cohort study in the clinical practice research Datalink 2004-2014. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014444. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014444 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. The Royal College of Ophthalmologists The way forward age-related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy 2016. Available: https://www.rcophth.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/RCOphth-The-Way-For... [Accessed 20 Jul 2019].
    1. Jyothi S, Elahi B, Srivastava A, et al. . Compliance with the Quality Standards of national diabetic retinopathy screening Committee. Prim Care Diabetes 2009;3:67–72. 10.1016/j.pcd.2009.05.005 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources