Improvement in Mortality With Early Fluid Bolus in Sepsis Patients With a History of Congestive Heart Failure
- PMID: 33083702
- PMCID: PMC7557190
- DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2020.05.008
Improvement in Mortality With Early Fluid Bolus in Sepsis Patients With a History of Congestive Heart Failure
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether rapid administration of a crystalloid bolus of 30 mL/kg within 3 hours of presentation harms or benefits hypotensive patients with sepsis with a history of congestive heart failure (CHF).
Patients and methods: A retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims data enhanced by medical record data from members of the High Value Healthcare Collaborative from July 1, 2013, to June 30, 2015, examining patients with a history of CHF who did (fluid bundle compliant [FBC]) or did not (NFBC) receive a volume bolus of 30 mL/kg within 3 hours of presentation to the emergency department. A proportional Cox hazard model was used to evaluate the association of FBC with 1-year survival.
Results: Of the 211 patients examined, 190 were FBC and 21 were NFBC. The FBC patients had higher average hierarchical condition category scores but were otherwise similar to NFBC patients. The NFBC patients had higher adjusted in-hospital and postdischarge mortality rates. The risk-adjusted 1-year mortality rate was higher for NFBC patients (hazard ratio, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.2 to 4.0; P=.01) than for FBC patients.
Conclusion: In a retrospective claim data-based study of elderly patients with a history of CHF presenting with severe sepsis or septic shock, there is an association of improved mortality with adherence to the initial fluid resuscitation guidelines as part of the 3-hour sepsis bundle.
Keywords: CHF, congestive heart failure; CMS, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; ED, emergency department; FBC, fluid bundle compliant; HCC, hierarchical condition category; HR, hazard ratio; HVHC, High Value Healthcare Collaborative; NFBC, not fluid bundle compliant; SEP-1, Sepsis CMS Core Measure.
© 2020 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Figures


References
-
- Rhodes A., Evans L.E., Alhazzani W., et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3):486–552. - PubMed
-
- Kelm D.J., Perrin J.T., Cartin-Ceba R., Gajic O., Schenck L., Kennedy C.C. Fluid overload in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock treated with early goal-directed therapy is associated with increased acute need for fluid-related medical interventions and hospital death. Shock. 2015;43(1):68–73. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Marik P.E., Linde-Zwirble W.T., Bittner E.A., Sahatjian J., Hansell D. Fluid administration in severe sepsis and septic shock, patterns and outcomes: an analysis of a large national database. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(5):625–632. - PubMed
-
- Leisman D.E., Goldman C., Doerfler M.E., et al. Patterns and outcomes associated with timeliness of initial crystalloid resuscitation in a prospective sepsis and septic shock cohort. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(10):1596–1606. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources