Association of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Wide Local Excision With Overall Survival Outcomes for Patients With Melanoma of the Trunk and Extremities
- PMID: 33084853
- PMCID: PMC7578913
- DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.3950
Association of Mohs Micrographic Surgery vs Wide Local Excision With Overall Survival Outcomes for Patients With Melanoma of the Trunk and Extremities
Abstract
Importance: Although previous database studies suggest that Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) treatment is associated with improved overall survival (OS) for head and neck melanomas, outcomes for trunk and extremity (T&E) tumors have not been adequately evaluated.
Objective: To assess survival outcomes for patients with melanomas of the T&E treated with MMS vs wide local excision (WLE).
Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study examined deidentified data from the National Cancer Database between 2004 and 2015. Inclusion criteria for the analysis included diagnosis of trunk, upper extremity, or lower extremity melanoma; known Breslow depth; removal by MMS or WLE; and known last date of survival status.
Main outcomes and measures: Five-year all-cause mortality (ACM) rates.
Results: A total of 188 862 in situ and invasive melanomas were included in the analysis (MMS, 2.3%; WLE, 97.7%); the mean (SD) age of patients included was 58.8 (16.0) years, and 52.7% were male. Multivariate analysis demonstrated no OS difference among trunk (WLE hazard ratio [HR], 1.097; 95% CI, 0.950-1.267; P = .21), upper extremity (WLE HR, 1.013; 95% CI, 0.872-1.176; P = .87), lower extremity (WLE HR, 0.934; 95% CI, 0.770-1.134; P = .49), or combined T&E (WLE HR, 1.031; 95% CI, 0.941-1.130; P = .51) tumors. Factors associated with increased risk of ACM on multivariate analysis of all tumors included increasing age (HR, 1.043; 95% CI, 1.042-1.044; P < .001), no insurance or nonprivate insurance (none: HR, 1.921 [95% CI, 1.782-2.071]; Medicaid: HR, 2.410 [95% CI, 2.242-2.591]; Medicare: HR, 1.237 [95% CI, 1.194-1.281]; other government insurance: HR, 1.279 [95% CI, 1.117-1.465]; P < .001 for all), positive surgical margins (HR, 1.609; 95% CI, 1.512-1.712; P < .001), a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score greater than 0 (Charlson-Deyo score of 1: HR, 1.340; 95% CI, 1.295-1.385; P < .001; Charlson-Deyo score of ≥2: HR, 2.044; 95% CI, 1.934-2.159; P < .001), tumor ulceration (HR, 2.175; 95% CI, 2.114-2.238; P < .001), and increasing Breslow depth (HR, 1.002 [per 0.1 mm]; P < .001). Female sex (HR, 0.698; 95% CI, 0.680-0.716; P < .001) and nonnodular subtype (lentigo maligna/lentigo maligna melanoma: HR, 0.743; 95% CI, 0.686-0.805; P < .001; superficial spreading: HR, 0.739; 95% CI, 0.710-0.769; P < .001; other subtype: HR, 0.817; 95% CI, 0.790-0.845; P < .001; nodular: HR, 1 [reference]) were associated with improved OS.
Conclusions and relevance: This cohort study of patients surgically treated for melanomas of the trunk and/or extremities found that, compared with WLE, MMS was not associated with significantly different OS for T&E melanomas.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
Improved overall survival of melanoma of the head and neck treated with Mohs micrographic surgery versus wide local excision.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020 Jan;82(1):149-155. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.059. Epub 2019 Aug 29. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020. PMID: 31473297
-
Treatment of Cutaneous Melanoma of the Head and Neck With Wide Local Excision Versus Mohs.Laryngoscope. 2021 Nov;131(11):2490-2496. doi: 10.1002/lary.29570. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Laryngoscope. 2021. PMID: 33844289
-
Outcomes of Melanoma In Situ Treated With Mohs Micrographic Surgery Compared With Wide Local Excision.JAMA Dermatol. 2017 May 1;153(5):436-441. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.6138. JAMA Dermatol. 2017. PMID: 28241261 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of local recurrence rates of head and neck cutaneous melanomas after wide local excision, Mohs micrographic surgery, or staged excision.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Sep;85(3):681-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.04.090. Epub 2021 May 4. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021. PMID: 33961921
-
Mohs micrographic surgery in the surgical treatment paradigm of melanoma in situ and invasive melanoma: A clinical review of treatment efficacy and ongoing controversies.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024 Sep;91(3):499-507. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2024.05.024. Epub 2024 May 19. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2024. PMID: 38768857 Review.
Cited by
-
The Frequency of Microsatellite Metastases, Satellite Metastases, and Residual Tumor in Thin Melanomas: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Dermatol Pract Concept. 2025 Apr 1;15(2):5157. doi: 10.5826/dpc.1502a5157. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2025. PMID: 40401854 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Retrospective Analysis of 243 Patients with Rhinofacial Ulcers.Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Aug 1;15:1475-1483. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S371029. eCollection 2022. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022. PMID: 35935600 Free PMC article.
-
Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting immune-related prognostic features in trunk melanoma-specific death.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Dec;10(24):1371. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-6045. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36660695 Free PMC article.
-
Disease-specific survival of malignant melanoma after Mohs micrographic surgery is not impacted by initial margins: A systematic review and meta-analysis.JAAD Int. 2023 Jun 28;13:140-149. doi: 10.1016/j.jdin.2023.06.009. eCollection 2023 Dec. JAAD Int. 2023. PMID: 37823046 Free PMC article.
-
Wise or wide (WoW) study protocol: a national, multicentre, prospective, randomised and controlled, parallel group, non-inferiority study to compare single-staged versus two-staged excisions of thin invasive (≤1.0 mm) melanoma.BMJ Open. 2025 Apr 2;15(4):e094544. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094544. BMJ Open. 2025. PMID: 40180392 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network Melanoma (Version 4.2020). Accessed September 25, 2020. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cutaneous_melanoma.pdf
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical